• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • TfL latest to face credit-rating downgrade by Moody’s

    May 10, 2022

  • Government proposes ‘fairer, more accurate’ business rates system

    May 10, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

David Green: Dashing hopes for the local infrastructure rate

0
  • by David Green
  • in Treasury
  • — 11 Jan, 2017

Will the local infrastructure rate provide a great boost to local government finance? David Green argues there are other ways to make a difference.

David Green, Arlingclose

David Green, Arlingclose

I overheard a conversation in a local authority canteen after the chancellor’s Autumn Statement last month. The leader of the council was very happy: “I hear that the government is investing £7bn in local authority infrastructure,” he said. “Ah, no,” said the cabinet member for finance, who had been listening more carefully. “The £7bn is for housing. Its only £1bn they are dishing out for the infrastructure to support.”

The finance director was at the table too, and she had actually read some of the statement. “I’m afraid it’s not that good,” she said. “They aren’t giving any money out at all. But they are going to let us borrow a £1bn at reduced rates”. The treasury manager sitting to her side then dampened spirits even further. “It’s even worse than that. They are only going to let us bid for permission to borrow.”

At this point I leant over and completely dashed their hopes. “You’re all being too optimistic”, I said. “The government is only consulting on letting you bid to borrow money at a reduced rate.” And no-one else should get too excited either, because the new local infrastructure rate at 0.6% above the government’s own cost of borrowing won’t change much at all, if it even happens.

Over 400 authorities will be allowed to bid for a share of the £1bn. Even if district and borough councils, who have limited infrastructure responsibilities, don’t bid, that still leaves 200 upper tier authorities. And £5m each doesn’t build many roads – a single mile of country lane, rather less if you want a dual carriageway by-pass, and just 300 yards of motorway.

Then don’t forget the government isn’t giving you the money, just a 0.2% discount on the interest costs compared to the Certainty Rate. That works out at about £7,000 a year on a £5m 50 year annuity loan. I doubt many local infrastructure projects have stalled for the lack of £7,000 in the capital financing budget.

And, of course, local authorities still have £40bn cash to hand, almost all of it invested at rates below the proposed Local Infrastructure Rate. So, there is plenty of scope for authorities to either spend their own cash or to borrow more cheaply from a neighbour before resorting to the PWLB.

If the government is serious about reforming the PWLB to encourage local authority capital expenditure, there are other things it can do. The most obvious is to cut its profit margin, especially at shorter maturity dates – the current flat margin of 0.8% in all periods makes little sense. And to do this for all loans to all authorities, not just those partaking in a time-consuming, cash-limited bidding process.

More adventurous reform would include forward start dates or phased drawdowns, so that authorities can agree funding in advance of spending it; and flexible repayment structures tailored to income streams, so they can afford to repay the loans more easily. Then we might really get some infrastructure up and running!

The HM Treasury consultation on the Local Infrastructure Rate can be found here and closes on 27th January 2017.

David Green is Client Director at Arlingclose Limited.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

 

Share

You may also like...

  • Local authority bonds: Do they hold the answer to housing? 22nd Apr, 2021
  • What would negative sterling interest rates mean for UK money market funds? 25th Feb, 2021
  • Bank of England battles inflation with latest interest rate rise 21st Mar, 2022
  • Mike Thatcher: constructing a new role for local government 27th Jan, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 11 hours ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

    Room151 5 days ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 5 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 5 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 6 days ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 7 days ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

    Room151 1 week ago

    Insights and inspiration from LGPS leaders past and present: Four current and former LGPS leaders have recently given powerful and insightful interviews as part of the Fiftyfaces podcast, which showcases inspiring investors and their stories. Hosted by… dlvr.it/SQ53lC pic.twitter.com/IRYMFPxdA2

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Alison Griffin: Can we afford not to be more commercial?
  • Next story Northants s151 hits back at Daventry’s call for government intervention

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares