• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

David Green: How to set an inter-authority loan rate

0
  • by David Green
  • in Blogs · David Green · Treasury
  • — 14 May, 2018

Lending between councils has become controversial with some accused of offering loans at “bargain basement” rates. David Green analyses the elements that go into setting a rate.

Inter-authority lending has hit the local headlines again, with Wirral Council being accused of “bailing out” other councils with “bargain basement” loans. As most readers of this site will already appreciate, the story is unfair for several reasons.

Would the accuser instead prefer the council to “bail out” the bank by leaving the cash interest free in the current account? Or, pay staff and invoices before services have been received? And the average interest rate received on the quoted loans is well above the average base rate for the period in question.

But it does raise the question: what is the correct interest rate to lend to another local authority? One way to consider this is in the time-honoured tradition of security, liquidity and yield.

Method

CIPFA/LASAAC ruled recently that no impairment provision need be made for loans to other local authorities, since they allegedly cannot default. But the Prudential Regulation Authority takes a different view of banks lending to councils. And public credit ratings for UK local authorities vary from AA (the third highest and equal to central government) to A+ (the fifth highest), so hardly risk-free.

A quick analysis of councils’ accounts and budgets shows markedly different levels of reserves, a key indicator of the likelihood of repayment. So some caution is merited, especially with longer term loans. But the safeguards in the Local Government Acts are thorough, and so credit risk appears minimal, at least within the timeframe for legislative change. Lenders should therefore expect to earn little margin for security.

Liquidity will be an issue, as local authority loans are usually non-transferable and the market for tradable loans is pretty thin. So, some element of term premium should be built into interest rates beyond a couple of months to compensate the lender for tying their cash up and giving the borrower certainty of funding.

Yield in this context means considering alternatives. Instant access bank accounts and money market funds pay around base rate, so a fixed-term loan needs to take account of expected increases in base rates over the term. Economic weakness and the Bank of England’s “unreliable boyfriend” notwithstanding, lenders should build in at least some rate rises in the coming year.

But alternative rates for borrowers should also be considered and, in this context, this includes the PWLB. Their one-year loan currently stands at 1.43%, providing ample room for competitor lenders to undercut the board.

Supply and demand

A separate method of determining the “correct” rate for an inter-authority loan is to evaluate supply and demand by testing the market. Treasury managers will be used to receiving guidance from brokers on where the market is, but with cheap electronic platforms increasing in popularity, more transparent price discovery is now available.

When lending, the key is not to just rely on the bids entered by potential borrowers showing the rate they would like to pay, but to input your own offers at the higher rate you would like to receive. To use the market jargon, you should be a price-maker rather than a price-taker. In a well-functioning market, the bids and offers will move closer together until a deal is struck.

The fees charged to borrowers by brokers and platforms also have a part to play in the interest rate. Where fees are lower, the lender should expect at least a half share of the saving.

In summary, local authorities with surplus cash for a period of time should calculate the minimum interest rate that compensates them for the risk of lending for that term. If this is higher than the bid rates currently available, you should communicate your required rate to potential borrowers via brokers, platforms and direct contacts and let the market come to you. A robust process like this should help you to counter claims of subsidising other authorities at unreasonably cheap rates.

David Green is strategic director at Arlingclose Limited.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Pensions code of practice represents intensified scrutiny for LGPS Pensions code of practice represents intensified scrutiny for LGPS 22nd Jul, 2021
  • Bereavement matters 20th Jul, 2021
  • IFRS 16: A lot of effort, but a great opportunity too 25th Jan, 2022
  • Settlement 2022-2023: £53.9bn in ‘one-year’ deal aimed at ‘stability’ 17th Dec, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 5 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 5 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Minister appoints commissioners to oversee Northamptonshire’s finance and governance
  • Next story MP tables bill to ban PWLB borrowing for commercial property acquisition

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares