• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Guidance counselling: addressing the commercial property borrowing craze

0
  • by David Green
  • in Blogs · David Green · Resources · Treasury
  • — 5 Nov, 2018

Photo: PIxabay, CC0

Strongly worded statements and additional guidance might not be enough to wean councils off their addiction to borrowing to fund property investments, says David Green.

Local authorities must not borrow more than or in advance of their needs purely to profit from the investment of the sum borrowed, we were reminded again by the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) last month, in a tone reminiscent of a public health advert.

The warning comes in the wake of news that, despite the issue of strengthened government investment guidance and an updated Prudential Code for Capital Finance in Local Authorities in the past 12 months, some authorities continue to drink from the punchbowl and borrow to purchase commercial property.

The problem with repeating this prescription is that, according to the new prudential code, commercial property still counts as “need” rather than “investment”.

The key indicator of prudence in the code is that, except in the short-term, debt should remain below the capital financing requirement.

This requirement is described as the “underlying need to borrow for capital purposes” and defined as including the value of all property whether it is held to deliver services, for rental income or for sale.

Investments, on the other hand, are defined as including treasury management investments and shareholdings – but excluding all directly owned property.

So, months after publication of its prudential code and mere weeks after the release of the accompanying guidance notes at a cost of £1,000 per authority, CIPFA has announced it will be publishing even more guidance.

Alternative cures

If we are to avoid a Nightmare on High Street where local authorities are forced to attend continual guidance therapy until their addiction is cured, then I suspect that some more fundamental surgery will be required instead.

Government, of course, has more tools at its disposal than CIPFA, providing it is willing to soften its approach to localism.

Most concern appears to be expressed over the use of cheap and easy Public Works Loans Board (PWLB) cash to purchase commercial property, as private sector lenders tend to be more discerning in how their cash will be used, and therefore ask more searching questions before lending.

The PWLB could request confirmation that its loans will only be used to support the eponymous public works rather than investment, or charge a higher interest rate for the latter.

But policing that will be difficult, given the fungibility of cash and the complexity of local government finance.

I doubt PWLB loans will come in suitcases full of marked banknotes for HM Treasury to trace through the system and see exactly what they are spent on.

Closing the PWLB and forcing the sector to borrow on purely commercial terms would be a drastic step.

But repurposing some of local authorities’ £30bn cash not already lent within the sector would fill the gap for a while. It might also resuscitate the Municipal Bond Agency.

The end of cheap and easy money would certainly force lenders and borrowers to focus more on risk management.

Primary legislation is another option for government to pursue.

There is a private member’s bill currently in the parliamentary queue that would prevent local authorities buying property outside their boundary without permission, or from borrowing to buy any property for non-core purposes.

But such bills rarely become law, and our current localist government seems unlikely to sponsor anything similar, especially given their other priorities for parliamentary time.

Existing legislation already permits the secretary of state to determine that certain items are not to be classed as capital expenditure.

This can be applied via regulations to all local authorities in England, or via direction only to the individual authorities that have irked Mr Brokenshire.

Unintended consequences

Classing investment property as not being capital expenditure would remove it from the capital financing requirement and hence limit an authority’s ability to borrow, while complying with its prudential indicator for prudence.

But it could come with unintended consequences – for example, non-capital assets do not need a minimum revenue provision (MRP) which could make them more attractive to buy.

On that subject, since 2008, MRP rules have also been delivered through guidance instead of legislation, allowing adventurous authorities to bend them to suit the business case.

But putting this back to a statutory footing, if only for commercial property, would be a simple step for government since secondary legislation takes up far less time than an act of parliament.

A flat 5% MRP charge like the current guidance for shareholdings, or maybe 50% of rental income, would certainly be a disincentive, and there could be transitional protection for purchases made before the recent guidance.

None of this medicine would be easy for local authorities to swallow, and given problems with defining investment property, they all risk either being ineffective placebos or poisoning sensible capital investment in public services.

But issuing informal guidance clarifying the guidance notes that explain the statutory guidance, or writing another strongly worded letter, isn’t going to cure the patient either.

David Green is Strategic Director at Arlingclose Limited

Share

You may also like...

  • Agent151: Spending control needs a credible vision and everyone on board Agent151: Spending control needs a credible vision and everyone on board 9 Oct, 2017
  • UK banks approach “peak liquidity” says Fitch UK banks approach “peak liquidity” says Fitch 24 Jan, 2013
  • The big bond sell off and prospects for fixed income The big bond sell off and prospects for fixed income 11 Jul, 2013
  • Local Authorities’ Property Fund outperforms peer group Local Authorities’ Property Fund outperforms peer group 24 Apr, 2014

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 2 days ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 2 days ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 3 days ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 4 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 4 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 5 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Commercial property investment: The need for new guidance
  • Next story LGPS pooling paves way for housing investments

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.