• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • LGA calls for government support as regulators face staffing issues

    May 19, 2022

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Prudential Code brings ‘clarity’ to investment strategies

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Treasury
  • — 14 Jan, 2022

Photo: Shutterstock

New guidance from CIPFA has been hotly debated. Scott Dorling offers a lawyer’s guide through the new Prudential Code.

The revised CIPFA Prudential Code for Capital Finance in Local Authorities was issued on 20 December 2021. It has provided clarity on a number of matters, and assuages concerns about the potential forced sale of local authority commercial investment properties.

Section 2 of The Local Authorities (Capital Finance and Accounting) (England) Regulations 2003 requires local authorities to have regard to the Prudential Code when complying with the duty under section 3 of the Local Government Act 2003—the duty to keep under review how much it can afford to borrow.



Prohibition

For many years the code has suggested a prohibition on borrowing by reference to the terminology of borrowing “in advance of need”. There was some potential confusion arising from statements in the previous code and other relevant guidance.

The previous version of the code provided that local authorities must not borrow more than, or in advance of, their needs purely in order to profit from the investment of the extra sums borrowed.

However, the code acknowledged that borrowing in advance of need could take place as it suggested that authorities should also consider carefully whether they could demonstrate value for money in borrowing in advance of need and could ensure the security of such funds.

The current Statutory Guidance on Local Authority Investments, issued pursuant to section 15 of the Local Government Act 2003, similarly “prohibits” borrowing “in advance of need” purely in order to profit from the investment of the extra sums borrowed.

As the code and the guidance are not themselves legislative prohibitions – they are matters that local authorities “must have regard to”. The statutory guidance acknowledges that some local authorities may nonetheless borrow in advance of need purely to profit from the investment. If they do so, their investment strategy should explain why the local authority has taken the course of action and the local authority’s policies on risk management.

The 2021 version of the code does not introduce any new prohibitions in relation to borrowing. But, helpfully, it removes the “advance of need” terminology and emphasises the legislative basis for borrowing, namely that a local authority can borrow and invest for any legislative function and/or for the prudent management of their financial affairs.

The examples listed in the Code of legitimate prudential borrowing are:

  • Financing capital expenditure primarily related to the delivery of a local authority’s functions;
  • Temporary management of cash flow within the context of a balanced budget;
  • Securing affordability by removing exposure to future interest rate rises; or
  • Refinancing current borrowing, including replacing internal borrowing, to manage risk or reflect changing cash flow circumstances.

Investing for return

The new code includes a clear and unqualified statement that a local authority must not borrow to invest primarily for financial return.

Most local authority borrowing will be via the Public Works Loan Board (PWLB, or more accurately the UK Debt Management Office). The rules for accessing PWLB borrowing were changed in 2020 to require a chief finance officer’s certification that their local authority’s capital spending plans do not include the acquisition of assets primarily for yield.

While the code refers to investments primarily for a “financial return” and the PWLB access rules refer to investments primarily “for yield”, we believe this is a distinction without a difference.


22 March 2022
The Marriott Hotel, Leeds
LATIF North
Lead sponsor: CCLA
Qualifying finance officers can register free of charge here


What does this mean for local authorities who have borrowed to invest in yield bearing commercial assets? The code sets out some very useful guidance in this regard:

53. Authorities with existing commercial investments (including property) are not required by this Code to immediately sell these investments. However, Authorities which have an expected need to borrow should review options for exiting their financial investments for commercial purposes in their annual treasury management or investment strategies. The options should include using the sale proceeds to repay debt or reduce new borrowing requirements. They should not take new borrowing if financial investments for commercial purposes can reasonably be realised instead, based on a financial appraisal which takes account of financial implications and risk reduction benefits. Authorities with commercial property may also invest in the repair, renewal and updating of their existing commercial properties.

The code does not require the sale of commercial assets. As one would expect, it suggests that commercial investments (presumably only those acquired primarily for yield) should, where the local authority has a need to borrow, be subject to an on-going review to consider exit arrangement, taking into account the financial implications and risk implications of doing so. That would be what a prudent investment strategy should consider in any event.

Scott Dorling is a partner and head of public sector at law firm Trowers & Hamlins.

—————

FREE monthly newsletters
Subscribe to Room151 Newsletters

Room151 Linkedin Community
Join here

Monthly Online Treasury Briefing
Sign up here with a .gov.uk email address

Room151 Webinars
Visit the Room151 channel

Share

You may also like...

  • Pensions code of practice represents intensified scrutiny for LGPS Pensions code of practice represents intensified scrutiny for LGPS 22nd Jul, 2021
  • Inflation spike creates watching brief for treasury officers 24th Jun, 2021
  • David Green: Sidestepping the pitfalls of accounting for council-owned companies 14th May, 2021
  • The opportunity in the renewables and grid support market as UK looks to ‘build back better’ 3rd Mar, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 18 hours ago

    Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment: The Treasury has released new guidance that restricts local authorities’ access to Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) advances if there is a “more than negligible risk” of a council’s… dlvr.it/SQhLTV pic.twitter.com/vBsS7xMJdb

    Room151 18 hours ago

    Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers: There has been a mixed reaction to the government’s legislative plans to strengthen its intervention powers over local authority finances. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill has proposed… dlvr.it/SQhLMB pic.twitter.com/50foWxpPGs

    Room151 19 hours ago

    Post-Brexit struggles for national and local government regulators. @LGAcomms @NAOorguk Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/lga-call… #Brexit #government pic.twitter.com/s3c8ySGy5G

    Room151 24 hours ago

    CIPFA: a question of transparency: Roman Haluszczak’s campaign for publication of the independent report into the collapse of CIPFA’s London Counter Fraud Hub has been rejected again by the institute. He is now calling for[...] dlvr.it/SQgC5V pic.twitter.com/08fWsHFF4g

    Room151 2 days ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 2 days ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 2 days ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 2 days ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 3 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 1 week ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 1 week ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Treasury looks forward to old issues with new challenges
  • Next story Managing performance in a choppy UK money market

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares