• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

PWLB changes and local authority creditworthiness

0
  • by David Green
  • in Blogs · David Green · Treasury
  • — 27 Jan, 2021

David Green asks whether new borrowing rules should prompt lenders to reassess the risk of doing business with councils.

There are two main reasons why an organisation might default on its debts: insolvency, which is an accounting judgement that liabilities exceed assets and there is no reasonable likelihood of improvement; and illiquidity, which is the lack of ready cash to physically make the debt repayment.

The creditworthiness of UK local authorities is underpinned by statutory arrangements meaning that they cannot become insolvent, and by the presence of a lender of last resort meaning that they cannot become illiquid either.

However, recent changes to lending arrangements at HM Treasury’s PWLB lending facility (formerly the Public Works Loan Board) have brought this second safeguard into question.

Before agreeing a loan, PWLB will now ask for confirmation that the local authority is not planning to buy investment assets primarily for yield, such as commercial investment property, in the next three years.

Authorities unable to confirm this cannot borrow from PWLB to fund any capital expenditure, not just the investment asset in question.


A Practical Guide to Investing

February 16th – March 23rd, 2021
Six free weekly CPD-certified tutorials – view brochure
Register here with a .gov.uk email address


Outliers

This stance has been taken following concern in many quarters by the scale of investment activity undertaken by local authorities in recent years funded by public borrowing.

If central government doesn’t believe that investing in property is a good reason to increase the national debt, how can it be any different for local government with their higher cost of borrowing, the argument goes. There are also questions around the legality of borrowing to invest.

HM Treasury is hoping that the new lending arrangements will deter most authorities from buying investment assets primarily for yield, unless they are investing their own money which is much less of a concern.

But what about the outliers that intend to continue this activity, and borrow from elsewhere to fund this, such as other local authorities or the private sector? Can those lenders be assured they will be repaid on time when the PWLB taps have been turned off? Should interest rates on loans rise to cover additional credit risk?

The answer is that there is no need to worry. The PWLB guidance is clear that it will still lend to refinance maturing debt from any lender, even if the local authority is planning activity that makes it otherwise ineligible for PWLB support.

So, there is no need for lenders to reappraise the credit standing of local authorities as a result of these new arrangements.


Room151’s Monthly Online Treasury Briefing

February 26th, 2021
Sustainable investing for treasurers
Register here with a .gov.uk email address


Loopholes

This does, of course, leave some loopholes that could be exploited. For example, an unscrupulous authority could fund an investment asset with a short-term private sector loan and then refinance from PWLB soon afterwards. But this is where you need to read the fine print.

Where HM Treasury has concerns regarding the continuing appropriateness of PWLB loans to a particular authority, it may make ongoing access to the PWLB conditional upon a borrower acting in accordance with HM Treasury’s reasonable instructions.

This could include requiring the authority to sell recently purchased investment property. If that is not done within a reasonable timeframe, HM Treasury can require the borrower to repay PWLB loans plus their early repayment premiums.

In this way, central government hopes to tread the fine line between curtailing what it sees as high risk activity and maintaining the creditworthiness of the local government sector.

The system may, of course, need tweaking further down the line. But they have made a clear statement that PWLB intends to remain the lender of last resort to avoid any local authority defaulting on its debt due to illiquidity.

David Green is Strategic Director at Arlingclose.

FREE monthly newsletters
Subscribe to Room151 Newsletters

Monthly Online Treasury Briefing
Sign up here with a .gov.uk email address

Room151 Webinars
Visit the Room151 channel

Share

You may also like...

  • CIPFA defends ‘huge prize’ in PWLB borrowing debate 20 Oct, 2020
  • Central bank communications may be less obvious than they seem Central bank communications may be less obvious than they seem 29 Jul, 2013
  • Credit spreads in focus Credit spreads in focus 2 Apr, 2012
  • Inter-authority lending peaks above £10bn in Q3 Inter-authority lending peaks above £10bn in Q3 22 Feb, 2018

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 15 hours ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 1 day ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 1 day ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 2 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 1 week ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Is local government funding “broken”?: Andrew Hardingham looks at the underlying issues that caused more than a third of respondents in the Room151/CCLA treasury survey to say that the funding system for local govenrment is[...] dlvr.it/RsYhsg pic.twitter.com/plNp7Ayys6

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    GameStop: A lesson for LGPS in the risks of short selling: Day traders coordinating their efforts through the social media platform Reddit have not only boosted the stock of US GameStop, but also badly hurt hedge funds engaged in huge bets[...] dlvr.it/RsGdVV pic.twitter.com/NTMC3j6J2u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Room151 panel backs unitary councils and devolution: Bigger isn’t always better when it comes to local government, according to Sir Bob Kerslake, chair of the Peabody Trust, but “ …we need to move to unitary government and[...] dlvr.it/RsFPNv pic.twitter.com/lT4eCi0TmV

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story FDs’ Summit experts defend councils as MPs label property investment ‘risky’
  • Next story Stephen Sheen: Audit predictions 2021

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.