• Home
  • About
  • 151 IMPACT AWARDS
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

Impact Awards –>
  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

PWLB consultation: Big change on the way but there are ‘grey areas’ and opportunities

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Funding · Treasury
  • — 14 Dec, 2020

Photo by Étienne Beauregard-Riverin on Unsplash

The consultation on PWLB borrowing has concluded creating a new landscape for funding property acquisition. Our experts look at the implications.

Tracie Langley

The spending review heralded the outcome of the recent PWLB consultation. This consultation was as a result of what the government deemed as inappropriate use of the low borrowing rates that the PWLB offers local authorities.

The PWLB has for years provided local authorities with easy access to borrowing with rates that were generally lower than the market to fund needed local infrastructure for the benefit of communities.

More recently some authorities started to use the low PWLB rates to fund purely yielding assets in order to provide income to supplement budgets that were under pressure after years of austerity.

Boundaries were pushed further when yielding assets began to be purchased outside of local authority boundaries, reducing the link between the actual asset and the local area.

The finite limited resources of the PWLB, instead of funding local infrastructure, were increasingly used to finance income yielding assets such as shopping centres and hotels that had no link to an Authorities community and in an economic crisis, could turn toxic.

The government objected to this and immediately increased PWLB rates by 100bps to disincentivise this activity, unfortunately the increase also applied to the cost of borrowing for much needed local infrastructure initiatives.

This was not all negative as it allowed for some alternative providers to enter the market as well as increased activity in the local to local market. But realising the PWLB rate increase was a blunt method of dealing with the issue the Government launched a consultation on revisions to the PWLB.

The outcome is a set of rules for the use of PWLB that prevents borrowing for purely yielding assets and reversing the 100bps increase. This is good news for Local Authorities providing another competitive way of funding borrowing for the much needed investment in their local community.

Tracie Langley is chief operating officer at Cornwall Council.

Chris Brain

I look at this question through the lens of commercial property investment, which will remain a necessity for many. Authorities need to know what they can still do. No set of rules or guidance can ever be watertight, especially at the first iteration. Below are my Top 5 opportunities.

The proposed new guidance does leave gaps to be exploited, should the s151 officer be minded to do so. That will come down to risk and conscience.

The key to the PWLB guidance is what the investment is primarily for, given that many projects will straddle the boundaries of the categories.
If you have any projects that are primarily for yield then borrowing is simply not available to you. But that does not prevent you from borrowing for projects that are primarily for other purposes, which also happen to generate a financial yield.

So, what other opportunities are there?

  1. Sweating your existing “legacy” commercial property portfolio and operational portfolio, spotting opportunities where an injection of investment could generate greater yields;
  2. Borrowing to build yield-bearing investments on existing local authority land;
  3. Buying “yield” projects where you intend to inject further investment beyond the initial purchase price, e.g., through refurbishing or re-purposing;
  4. Borrowing to buy, or build new service assets, and re-purposing the existing redundant assets into “yield” assets;
  5. Assembling land for development.

There remain opportunities to invest and to generate investment income. Authorities may need to be smarter, identifying investment opportunities beyond simply going to the market and buying investments off the shelf or that deliver primary outcomes other than yield.

Chris Bain is founder of Chris Brain Associates.

Nick Keeling

After waiting four months, the PWLB consultation response was published and new rules implemented overnight. At least we were given a few hours’ notice this time, and Arlingclose was fortunate to be able to discuss the nuances of the guidance with HM Treasury shortly after publication.

The basic message from HMT: lower rates for legitimate spending, and don’t bother applying for anything else. But delve into the guidance and try to apply it to the myriad different schemes in which LAs get involved, and the grey area unsurprisingly starts to expand. HMT has sensibly delegated responsibility for navigating the fog to the professional judgement and integrity of others, namely s151 officers.

So, what are the next steps? The immediate requirement for finance directors is to affirm or change the capital plans submitted to access the certainty rate. HMT is using this submission as the basis for PWLB access and it is to these plans that the new buying investment assets primarily for yield question will be applied (PIAPY). When considering plans there appear to be a number of steps to take.

Firstly, categorising the schemes within capital plans, flagging those that are or could be perceived as PIAPY. Most will already have taken this step and removed questionable plans, and have immediate access to new PWLB loans.

Where these schemes can’t or won’t be removed, or where they are firmly ensconced in the grey area, the financial exposure of not being able to access the PWLB needs to be established. This could cover refinancing needs, internal borrowing capacity, liquidity risk, but ultimately it is the cost of complying or not complying.

Are there any choices we can make to mitigate these risks? Changing the project scope, for instance, to legitimately incorporate it into a service need or a regeneration scheme. Perhaps looking at timing, or maybe borrowing in a way to reduce the potential costs of enforced PWLB repayment.

And consider the alternatives to the PWLB. Let’s not forget that most LAs have coped perfectly well without PWLB borrowing for the past 12 months. While these have been abnormal times, we do not expect a liquidity drought in the LA to LA market and private sector funders may find that new PWLB rates are not unmatchable.

Nick Keeling is client director at Arlingclose.

Photo by Étienne Beauregard-Riverin on Unsplash.

FREE monthly newsletters
Subscribe to Room151 Newsletters

Monthly Online Treasury Briefing
Sign up here with a .gov.uk email address

Room151 Webinars
Visit the Room151 channel

Share

You may also like...

  • CIPFA chief calls for ministers to lose Fair Funding Review role CIPFA chief calls for ministers to lose Fair Funding Review role 16 May, 2019
  • Councils “cannot afford” high rise repairs following Grenfell tragedy Councils “cannot afford” high rise repairs following Grenfell tragedy 17 Aug, 2017
  • CIPFA’s Alison Scott on local authority borrowing CIPFA’s Alison Scott on local authority borrowing 12 Dec, 2011
  • Spanish worries: Santander in the spotlight Spanish worries: Santander in the spotlight 13 Apr, 2012

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    Impact Awards: Liverpool’s cafe culture and Warrington’s investment in homes: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards showcase  finance teams with a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight Liverpool City Council’s… dlvr.it/RxJsKb pic.twitter.com/dEYpaz6HP0

    Room151 1 day ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for housing or regeneration? Check out the 'Place Shaping' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @31tenConsulting in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !! pic.twitter.com/dU99vE6Wws

    Room151 2 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for Adult Social Care & Health? Check out the ASC&H category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by Fundamentum Social Housing REIT in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 2 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for the environment? Check out the 'carbon management' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @ACSLLP in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 2 days ago

    So what are the seven categories for the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards? Here they are room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… #localgov #finance #outcomes

    Room151 2 days ago

    Why should LGPS be concerned about rising inflation?: The impact of the coronavirus pandemic, lockdown and wider economic uncertainty created  deflationary pressures which raise important considerations for the Local Government Pension Scheme writes… dlvr.it/RxF7Fs pic.twitter.com/JlcjROBIpz

    Room151 3 days ago

    JOB ALERT: LPFA Finance Director vacancy: London Pensions Fund Authority Finance Director and s151 Officer Competitive salary and benefits The largest Local Government Pension (LGPS) provider in London with around £6.5 billion of assets and 135[...] dlvr.it/RxBdJP

    Room151 3 days ago

    Richard Harbord: Further signs that local government finance is failing: The crisis in Liverpool and a fix for education budgets are further indication that local government finance is in need of a root and branch review. Even for those students[...] dlvr.it/Rx9PSV pic.twitter.com/sAanC2gEyu

    Room151 1 week ago

    Impact Awards: Finance helps launch school meals company and support business during lockdown: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards will showcase the way finance teams have a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight… dlvr.it/RwnlF4 pic.twitter.com/AJhne1MVG4

    Room151 1 week ago

    "This work has made a vital, practical contribution to ensuring people have been supported through the pandemic." #impact #151awards #covid #s151 room151.co.uk/treasury/impac… #impactcasestudies #councilfinancemakesadifference

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ #passiton #localgov #s151 #151awards pic.twitter.com/A0uO0dwBkM

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Financial pressures loom for 2023 and beyond: Kate Ogden writes the government has addressed most of the short-term Covid-19 financial pressures facing English councils, but problems loom in 2022-23 and the years following. As we enter the[...] dlvr.it/RwfDsz pic.twitter.com/hpv2R09w75

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Calling all #localgov finance officers and #s151s room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ It's the #151Awards Thanks to the @LGALocalism for helping us get the word out along with all the LA treasury societies. pic.twitter.com/Nkal9BrH1J

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story 2021: Better income outcomes?
  • Next story Settlement must address ‘precarious’ local government finances

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.