• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

UKMBA acts in the interests of local government

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Treasury
  • — 22 Oct, 2020

UKMBA

Sponsored article: The PWLB consultation raises the prospect of restrictions on council borrowing while the UKMBA remains a cheap alternative open to all local authorities, writes Christian Wall.

It remains to be seen whether the government will cut the PWLB’s margin and if so, by how much. The consultation, necessarily delayed due to Covid-19, gave the government considerable scope to deliver various outcomes and, most importantly, stated any reduction on the PWLB’s margin would be dependent on interest rates. Given that interest rates are lower than a year ago and one justification for the increased margin was a decrease in interest rates, it would be remarkable if the increased margin is fully reversed.

Other than the well-publicised moratorium on borrowing from the PWLB to invest “for profit”, the consultation also raised the prospect of other restrictions on councils borrowing through the PWLB.

Seemingly unnoticed, there may be limits to the maturity of loans offered by the PWLB with the document asserting that local authorities do not have assets with lifespans greater than 25 years; news, we suspect, to most local authorities.


12th Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum & FDs’ Summit
NOW A VIRTUAL EVENT + ZOOM151 Networking
Jan 21, 22 & 23, 2021


Alternatives

PWLB rates have always been arbitrary. In recent memory the effective headline rates have been 0.15%, 1.00%, 0.8% and 1.8% over gilts. None of these are market rates and none reflect the actual risks of lending to councils. In fact, higher PWLB margins work against councils seeking alternatives because investors can ask for higher rates than they would receive from borrowers in the housing, higher education and commercial sectors.

The arguments for setting up the UKMBA have been validated. The key goal has always been to insulate councils from arbitrary changes to the PWLB’s terms and conditions. If the retroactive introduction of repayment penalties in 2007—a move that was either illegal or would have been blocked by the courts in any other sphere—was not enough to convince everyone that an alternative is necessary, sudden changes to interest rates should.

There are other alternatives to the PWLB and the UKMBA. Whether these alternatives are appropriate depends on pricing, risk, flexibility and the specific needs and capabilities of each council.

Embracing, or rejecting out-of-hand, new developments without knowing the details and risks involved, while asserting the absolute moral, legal or financial certainty of one’s opinion, is wrong, but there are no simple answers.

Advice

It is increasingly apparent that the quality of advice provided to some councils and some councils’ understanding of the products, and related risks that they have entered into, is lacking.

One large financial services firm recently told potential local authority clients that a bond issued at CPI + 0.8%, with an inflation floor of 0%, had a negative real terms interest rate. This advice was, and is, plain wrong: the real terms coupon on a bond is the nominal coupon less inflation and thus the real terms interest rate could not be less than 0.8%. If you or your adviser do not have a clear understanding of long-term inflation rates and linked bonds, inflation linked bonds and income strips are best avoided.

More than one firm has told clients, even as late as June, that the opportunity to borrow from investors at spreads of 1.5% was “unprecedented”; we assume the spread of 0.8% to SONIA achieved by the UKMBA and Lancashire in March was deemed irrelevant. That the UKMBA and Lancashire then achieved a 1.00% spread to gilts in August for a 40-year bond must rankle.

Open

The UKMBA remains open to all authorities, although some will not clear the agency’s credit process and thus will be unable to borrow through the its pooled lending programmes, but the UKMBA offers alternatives. The UKMBA is a cheap alternative to the PWLB for any council seeking to borrow less than £250 million.

For those needing more, the UKMBA, in the year since its platform was opened up, has not turned down any council seeking to issue a benchmark bond issue through the UKMBA and nor will it.

It remains owned by local government, for local government and will always act in the interests of local government.

Christian Wall is a director at PFM Financial Advisors.


Room151’s Monthly Online Treasury Briefing

November 27th, 2020
Money market funds and deposit accounts
Register here with a .gov.uk email address


FREE monthly newsletters
Subscribe to Room151 Newsletters

 Monthly Online Treasury Briefing
Sign up here with a .gov.uk email address

Room151 Webinars
Visit the Room151 channel

Share

You may also like...

  • ESG in liquidity 13th Jan, 2021
  • ‘Unknowns’ linger in social care calculations 29th Sep, 2021
  • ‘We need to shift the focus of local authority accounting’ 20th Apr, 2022
  • Whitehall should be ‘wary’ of council tax rises as an answer to funding 27th Oct, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 2 days ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 3 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 1 week ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Local authority debt strategy and diversification in a new era
  • Next story The European transition to renewables: Investing smartly

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares