• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • London CIV appoints Dean Bowden as CEO

    August 18, 2022

  • Coventry secures over £115m of funding to decarbonise transport system

    August 18, 2022

  • Bexley Pension Fund appoints responsible investment consultant

    August 17, 2022

  • Leeds’ £120m levelling up bids offers ‘transformational change’

    August 16, 2022

  • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’

    August 15, 2022

  • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override

    August 12, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

West Berkshire’s lack of procurement process for Newbury development ruled unlawful

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Development
  • — 22 Nov, 2018

A local authority acted unlawfully when it entered a development agreement with a private developer without running a procurement process, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

The ruling clarifies the law of public procurement governing local authorities which are seeking to bring about the development of land in their ownership, according to experts.

It overturns a 2016 High Court judgement which found West Berkshire Council had not broken public contract rules when it appointed St Modwen Developments to carry out a mixed-use regeneration scheme on a former industrial site in Newbury.

The Court of Appeal ruling published last week said: “The development agreement constitutes a procurement in its result, and a procurement without a lawful procurement procedure under the 2004 directive and the 2006 regulations.

“The procurement crystallizes when St Modwen draws down the land.”

In 2015, the council issued a notice which said it believed that the development agreement fell outside of the scope of two European directives which would have made it a “public works contract” for which a procurement would have been required.

It said that this was because the agreement placed no binding obligation on St Modwen to undertake any development, that the council had not specified requirements for future works and the council would not exert influence on the design of future works.

However, the Court of Appeal ruling found that the ground lease entered into by St Modwen would contain an unqualified obligation to carry out works, and a corresponding obligation will also be brought into effect in the development agreement itself.

It said: “The development agreement made that commitment on the part of the council final and provided also for a reciprocal commitment on the part of St Modwen.

“It did so without a public procurement process, and without affording any opportunity for such a process to be gone through before the “public works contract” materialises.

“At that stage it would be too late.

“Thus a ‘public works contract’ will have come into being without a lawful procurement process.”

However, the court ruled that there was no suggestion of the council acting in bad faith, “or with any motive to create a mistaken understanding of its objectives in entering into the development agreement or of the ‘economic and commercial reality’ of the transaction”.

Kathrine Eddon, legal director at law firm Womble Bond Dickinson, told Room151 that the decision was important “for local authorities and developers alike”.

She said: “The reversal of the earlier court decision has caused a fair amount of concern for some authorities, as they grapple with what this means for their development plans.

“It’s likely to lead to a more cautious approach by authorities on regeneration projects which are felt to be ‘close to the line’, or are particularly complex, meaning more put out to tender under the procurement rules.

Authorities will be concerned to avoid the risk of a proposed deal being declared to be ineffective, and a penalty imposed, if they are challenged by someone who thinks they have made the wrong call on procurement.”

However, she added that each development will still need to be judged on its own merits.

Reacting to the verdict in a blog posting, Dan Crayford, commercial solicitor at Forbes Solicitors, said the decision confirms that build contracts entered into as a condition of a land contract are still works contracts.

This means that if they are above the relevant threshold for public works contracts – currently £4,551,413 – a council has a duty to carry out a procurement process.

He said: “Contractors have for years been persuading housing associations and other public contracting authorities that land-plus-building package deals are above board.

“Of course, it is in contractors’ best interests for this to be deemed to be the case, given that the contractor who owns the land would thereby be able to hold contracting authorities over a barrel in terms of appointing them to develop said land as a condition to the land contract.

“This is a common tactic for contractors who would ordinarily be unable to win a proper procurement process, by reason of being disqualified for previous failings in public contracts, for example.”

Crayford predicted that “we are now likely to see increased craftiness in the drafting of options and conditions to carry out above-threshold works, with nebulous semi-commitments replacing bold obligations…”

The case was brought by rival developer Faraday Development, which lost out to St Modwen for the right to be awarded the development contract.

The parties agreed, following judgement, that the regulations made it mandatory for the court to order the payment of a civil financial penalty by the council.

The amount of that penalty was fixed at £1.

A statement by the council said that it was “disappointed” by the Court of Appeal’s decision and that it is considering an appeal to the Supreme Court.

Council leader Graham Jones, said: “The regeneration of the London Road Industrial Estate remains a core part of our vision for Newbury. It is frustrating that this decision pauses our plans to bring new homes, affordable accommodation and high quality office to the area.

“It will delay our plans but not deter us from the ambitious, exciting redevelopment which we remain committed to delivering for people in Newbury and beyond.”

Share

You may also like...

  • McCloud consultation ends with “greater security” for LGPS members 4th Mar, 2021
  • LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’ 11th Aug, 2022
  • Treasurer societies favour permanent extension to IFRS 9 statutory override 18th Aug, 2022
  • Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data 30th Jun, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • London CIV appoints Dean Bowden as CEO
    • Coventry secures over £115m of funding to decarbonise transport system
    • Bexley Pension Fund appoints responsible investment consultant
    • Leeds’ £120m levelling up bids offers ‘transformational change’
    • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 17 hours ago

    Recovery position: withholding tax and the LGPS: Partner Content: Paul Sprenger from WTax talks to Room151 about how Local Government Pension Scheme funds could be missing out on millions of pounds of withholding tax recovery opportunities.… dlvr.it/SWsTfQ pic.twitter.com/z6aVMcaqHe

    Room151 1 day ago

    Treasurer societies favour permanent extension to IFRS 9 statutory override: Two treasurer society presidents have indicated their preference for the current five-year IFRS 9 statutory override to be made permanent following the government’s latest… dlvr.it/SWr3G4 pic.twitter.com/MGf9M5zC8Q

    Room151 2 days ago

    Luton Borough Council faces ‘grave’ £10m overspend: Luton Borough Council faces a £10m overspend in its 2022/23 budget which poses a “serious risk” to the authority’s financial sustainability. A report by Dev Gopal, director of finance, revenues[...] dlvr.it/SWmynD pic.twitter.com/ETDd7sQA48

    Room151 2 days ago

    Luton Borough Council faces ‘grave’ £10m overspend: Luton Borough Council faces a £10m overspend in its 2022/23 budget which poses a “serious risk” to the authority’s financial sustainability. room151.co.uk/funding/luton-… pic.twitter.com/XvyTZckW6m

    Room151 1 week ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 1 week ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 1 week ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 1 week ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Croydon to transfer homes into pension fund in 40 years
  • Next story Triumph of common sense: unlocking dormant charity funds

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares