• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Guy Ware: The chancellor, Eeyore no more?

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Resources
  • — 29 Nov, 2017

Philip Hammond. Photo: FOC, Flickr, CC

The chancellor Philip Hammond, once nicknamed Eeyore after the doleful donkey in Winnie The Pooh, led a budget that professed to bring good news. Guy Ware argues that the economic forecasts and policies such as Right to Buy pilots and the change in indexation from RPI to CPI, will do little to bring cheer.

The British public is tired of austerity, we are told. Luckily, that’s so over now.

The chancellor might have been forced to report the worst economic prospects for a generation, and to postpone deficit reduction until some point in the fourth millennium, but he still managed to titillate the Daily Mail. In a single sentence containing three demonstrably false assertions it declared: “A million first-time buyers were offered a lifeline yesterday as Philip Hammond brought austerity to a screeching halt with a £25bn spending spree.” Plus he told some jokes. “Eeyore no more,” indeed.

Personally, I always liked Eeyore. He may have been gloomy, but his heart was in the right place. The joy he found in a burst balloon and an empty honeypot was a thing of real wonder.

The chancellor, on the other hand, may have made whisky a little less expensive than it would otherwise have been, but otherwise offered little cheer to anyone who relies on public services or regards their existence as the hallmark of a civilised society.

Nonetheless, his budget was a success, of sorts. By this stage in the news cycle, we have become accustomed to the chancellor’s announcements falling into omnishambolic disarray. It is true that his biggest surprise—the abolition of stamp duty for first time buyers – burst like Piglet’s balloon the moment someone at the Office of Budget Responsibility got the chance to splutter: “He said what?” But somehow it didn’t seem to do him any harm.

From a parochial point of view, I was pleased enough to hear confirmation of the business rate retention pilot in London. Like other pilots, this is a small step toward greater local control of resources, if not yet any greater control over the setting of local taxes. (Readers outside the M25 might like to know that this “100% retention pilot” will actually result in London retaining 64% of the rates to be collected in the capital next year: £2.8bn will continue to support local services in the rest of the country.)

Giveaway

Apart from the welcome commitment to more frequent revaluations, however, there was no mention of that other Conservative manifesto promise—to reform the tax itself. Instead, there was the early cut in indexation from RPI to CPI.

This is no small beer. The previous plan to make the change in 2020 would have led, by 2040, to a cumulative loss of £80bn for local government services. By bringing it forward—and by the magic of compounding—the chancellor has increased the loss to a nice, round £100bn. That’s an awful lot of social workers and librarians. Yet the move attracted relatively little attention. No Corbynite seized upon this latest corporate tax giveaway. The business lobby were not exactly fulsome in their thanks. Even the LGA allowed the change to pass without comment.

Why? Partly because it was seen as old news, and partly because the tax has been successfully framed as a “problem”—particularly for small businesses. (It is an old saw that you incentivise business by cutting taxes, the poor by cutting benefits.) There are, of course, many things wrong with the way business rates work at present—which is precisely why many of us have argued for the real fiscal devolution that would allow reforms that work at local level.

The change in indexation was originally proposed in the context of wholesale changes that would also have determined what services the tax was supposed to pay for. By separating the two–and by appearing to forget the promise of wider reform—the chancellor has simply written billions off local government’s potential income without bothering to ask what the consequences might be.

Consequences

The rest of the budget meanwhile, went out of its way to ignore those potential consequences. The chancellor awarded some extra money to the NHS — albeit less than it wanted — but said nothing about adult social care. (The promised green paper is due in the summer of 2018, but there’s no sign of the cross-party consensus-building necessary for any real progress.) He said nothing about the growing and increasingly urgent crisis in children’s services funding.

Additional investment in housing will be welcome, but hardly constitutes the “spending spree” the Mail got so excited about. The vast majority of the new money is not actually money, but loans and guarantees or, in local government’s case, potential permission to borrow another £1bn between us—barely enough to touch the sides. Oh, and if we need help to pay for fire safety works post-Grenfell, we only need to ask (as if we hadn’t—and been rebuffed).

Meanwhile, despite the welcome disappearance of the high value asset proposals into the longest of long grass, the Midlands pilot suggests the government remains committed to the destruction of social housing by extending the “Right to Buy at a massive discount” to housing association tenants.

Reducing the waiting period for Universal Credit is a good idea, but does nothing to change the underlying £12bn cuts in welfare spending UC has been designed to deliver.

Social housing will continue to be sold faster than we can build it; “affordable housing” will remain an oxymoron; real wages will continue to stagnate and benefits will fall. What could possibly go wrong?

Not to worry, though. Because—in the fine British tradition of applying minuscule sticking plasters to gaping self-inflicted wounds— the government will fund some pilots to reduce rough sleeping.

Right.

It’ll take more than a few jokes about cough sweets to lift the gloom of Britain’s public servants. If you’re tired of austerity now, by the end of the decade you’ll be catatonic.

Guy Ware

Guy Ware is director of finance,
performance and
procurement at London Councils.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • The euro, brinkmanship and market distress The euro, brinkmanship and market distress 24 Nov, 2011
  • Billions needed to match EU funding for local communities after Brexit Billions needed to match EU funding for local communities after Brexit 28 Jul, 2017
  • One-year settlement decision ‘threatens Fair Funding Review’ One-year settlement decision ‘threatens Fair Funding Review’ 9 Aug, 2019
  • Court ruling leaves councils facing compensation bills for water overcharging Court ruling leaves councils facing compensation bills for water overcharging 3 Dec, 2019

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 21 hours ago

    New realities of investing cash and liquidity: “What to do now?”: Sponsored article: Brian Buck looks at the “unique challenge” for cash management strategies. As investors assess the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their business, levels of cash and… dlvr.it/RqVbk9 pic.twitter.com/ZElVASmEUV

    Room151 1 day ago

    Extra finance promised by the government receives a broad welcome: Sponsored article: The financial pressures facing local authorities this year continue to pose challenges for council treasurers. While the launch of the UK’s Covid-19 vaccination… dlvr.it/RqTzTF pic.twitter.com/HCjH0pyHR5

    Room151 1 day ago

    A savvy approach to managing your cash: Sponsored article: Caroline Hedges examines the need for active cash management to achieve a higher than average return. Last year saw the already mountainous pile of negative-yielding debt around the[...] dlvr.it/RqTzMK pic.twitter.com/uP0RQYTJLt

    Room151 2 days ago

    Putting alternatives at the heart of multi-asset portfolios: Sponsored article: Nick Edwardson looks at the assets that provide the “most attractive opportunities”. We believe that asset allocation is the primary driver of investment returns and that the… dlvr.it/RqQ2Qt pic.twitter.com/WLBzvRRRUQ

    Room151 2 days ago

    Thriving in the pandemic: Avoiding the stragglers: Sponsored article: George Crowdy looks at the sectors providing opportunities for sustainable investment. Throughout much of 2020, we talked about why sustainable investing has thrived in the pandemic,… dlvr.it/RqQ2NQ pic.twitter.com/dxiPWKFsPl

    Room151 2 days ago

    The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark: Sponsored article: Amy Browne examines the importance of investing in mental health in the workplace. We are living through a public health emergency in more ways than one. Physical health[...] dlvr.it/RqQ2Jx pic.twitter.com/o6yRSCX3oF

    Room151 3 days ago

    Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy: Sponsored article: Hetal Mehta looks at the impact of Brexit on economic prospects. Four and a half years after voting to leave the EU, on Christmas Eve the UK finally[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDt pic.twitter.com/No62srfE8h

    Room151 3 days ago

    Cash dethroned: The quest for liquid yield: Sponsored article: Peter Hunt and George Carne ask how treasury departments can balance the need for yield and liquidity. The massive stimulus and waves of liquidity provided by central banks[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDj pic.twitter.com/05g6Zhu1kU

    Room151 3 days ago

    Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point: The severe pressure on local government budgets now means section 151 officers confront a tricky call on  whether they can make a judgement on the robustness… dlvr.it/RqLBDV pic.twitter.com/vTAbDKFzkI

    Room151 4 weeks ago

    PWLB Consultation: Analysis straight from Dickens: Helen Radall and Paul McDermott present a legal examination of the new PWLB borrowing rules as Charles Dickens might have imagined it. Free and easy PWLB (“Marley” to his friends)[...] dlvr.it/RnmwLq pic.twitter.com/yFxcPrQqEG

    Room151 4 weeks ago

    Room151’s top stories from a momentous year: 2020 was the year in which local government grappled with Covid-19, funding strains, controversy over borrowing rules and the threat of financial collapse. It has been an exhausting and historic[...] dlvr.it/RnlpZg pic.twitter.com/g3myNyox6J

    Room151 4 weeks ago

    Tracy Bingham: 2020, a year best forgotten but also one of learning: Many will rush to erase 2020 from their memories but, writes Tracy Bingham, there were also many lessons about finance teams, strategic planning and leadership. 2020: A year we’d… dlvr.it/RnlpY2 pic.twitter.com/m7G1krrtCu

    Room151 4 weeks ago

    Settlement must address ‘precarious’ local government finances: Dan Bates crosses his fingers for “no nasty surprises” in this week’s funding settlement but argues the “bigger prize” is post-Covid financial certainty. Thursday (17 December) should be the… dlvr.it/Rnj9dG pic.twitter.com/KLKjjuBqJE

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB consultation: Big change on the way but there are ‘grey areas’ and opportunities: The consultation on PWLB borrowing has concluded creating a new landscape for funding property acquisition. Our experts look at the implications. Tracie Langley The… dlvr.it/RndRvJ pic.twitter.com/KEqXEBmEfq

    Room151 1 month ago

    2021: Better income outcomes?: Sponsored article: Investors should be mindful of structural challenges posed to income generation as a result of rapid thematic change. Jon Bell looks at the prospects for the coming year.[...] dlvr.it/RndRsw pic.twitter.com/TxVk8aXkMq

    Room151 1 month ago

    Capturing the ‘spirit’ of borrowing rules and a sequel for interest rate swaps: The year in treasury has been marked by a return for interest rate swaps and new rules from PWLB on borrowing for yield. Jackie Shute asks whether they will sprinkle[...] dlvr.it/RnQwv7 pic.twitter.com/it5FApdCcl

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Paddy Dowdall: The building blocks of pension fund investment in housing
  • Next story Expert warns to begin preparation now for IFRS 16 lease accounting standard

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK