• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’

    August 5, 2022

  • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades

    August 4, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Lack of benefits prompts shared services rethink

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Resources
  • — 27 Nov, 2019

A major local authority shared services venture involving Northamptonshire County Council is to be restructured after it was revealed that a number of service areas were only included to boost turnover.

LGSS was created in 2010 by Northamptonshire and Cambridgeshire county councils, with Milton Keynes joining as the third co-owner and partner in 2016.

SAVE THE DATE – LATIF NORTH
March 25th, 2020, Manchester
Council treasury investment & borrowing

According to a report to a meeting of Cambridgeshire councillors this week, the partners are in discussions over a new operating model because a number of service areas do not benefit from shared arrangements.

The report said: “It would appear that service areas were included within the scope of LGSS simply to increase the financial turnover of the organisation.

“Many service areas such as democratic services, finance and HR business partners, and operational IT simply support the organisations that they work in.

“There is no sharing of skills or resources and therefore the only benefit that is derived is through areas of significant procurement – the same outcome of which can be delivered without a shared service offer.”

In March 2018, LGSS came under criticism in a report by government commissioner Max Caller into the financial failings at Northamptonshire.

Caller said LGSS was “just a collection mechanism with a top layer of management working across all three authorities and winning a number of smaller contracts”.

He added: “LGSS claims to have delivered significant savings over its period of operation, but it is very hard to see what additional saving has been produced by the structural grouping and what could have been generated by normal management action.”

A report to Cambridgeshire councillors last month said of Caller’s report, “Whilst some of these comments may have had an element of substance others were at best unsubstantiated and at worst factually incorrect.”

However, at that meeting, a decision was taken to repatriate professional finance and democratic services functions from LGSS – in line with an earlier decision by Northamptonshire.

The three partner councils are also considering a secret report by the Chartered Institute for Public Finance and Accountancy over the future operating model.

The report said this will result in further shared service areas repatriated to individual councils.

It also revealed that, following the issues at Northamptonshire, and Caller’s subsequent report, “the opportunity to ‘sell’ services to more public sector organisations has become almost impossible”.

In addition, a major client, Norwich City Council, has given notice that it will terminate its contract in March 2020.

LGSS is also set to lose profits from the provision of services to Northamptonshire when it is abolished by April 2021.

“These two clients alone contribute around £1m to the management overheads of the LGSS operations,” the report said.

The partners hope to complete work on the new operating model within three months, although the report  admitted that “this is a very challenging ask and it is possible that it will not be delivered within this timescale”.

It added that the principles in the proposed new model “are a compromise as all three organisations are not getting exactly what they had hoped for at the start of the discussions over the future model of LGSS”.

It concluded: “There is still a large amount of work to be done, as for many service areas the issue is not simply a matter of adjusting reporting lines.”

The Room151 Weekly Newsletter covers local government treasury and pension investment, funding, development, resources and technical finance. Register here. 

The LGPS Quarterly Briefing focuses purely on pension fund investment. Register here.

Share

You may also like...

  • ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays 13th May, 2022
  • “Localism, localism, localism”, or simply time for better funding 19th Apr, 2021
  • LGPS funds seeking to divest from Russia 3rd Mar, 2022
  • 151 officers must remain at the top table 22nd Jun, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
    • Consultation opens into care charging reforms
    • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’
    • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades
    • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 7 hours ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 24 hours ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 1 day ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 2 days ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 5 days ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 6 days ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 1 week ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

    Room151 1 week ago

    The case for residential investment: income, impact and resilience: Partner Content: Emma Gullifer from Columbia Threadneedle discusses the options for pension funds looking to invest in residential property including the Build-to-Rent market.… dlvr.it/SVzKwN pic.twitter.com/hdgZ4zKt4H

    Room151 1 week ago

    Draft accounts: delays continue despite deadline dash: Dan Bates discusses the latest data on the publication of local authority accounts and examines why so many councils missed the 31 July deadline. Sunday 31 July 2022 was the[...] dlvr.it/SVx2ZT pic.twitter.com/gdELhD3Yis

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Council report casts doubt on emergence of competitive PWLB alternatives
  • Next story Council feels financial squeeze on housing company pledge

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK