• Home
  • About
  • Newsletters
  • Conference
  • TMS Links
  • Calendar
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Brunel appoints global high alpha managers

    December 11, 2019

  • City of London completes £250m debt deal

    December 11, 2019

  • Mystery bidder appointed on £250m waste contract

    December 11, 2019

  • Investors withdraw from property fund

    December 11, 2019

  • Highland councillors back tourist tax

    December 11, 2019

  • Glasgow raises £195m in debt finance deal

    December 5, 2019

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Jobs

Ministry repeats business rates blunder despite tightened oversight

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Resources
  • — 3 Jun, 2019
Melanie Dawes, DCLG. Photo: Tina Miguel

The government has been left red-faced – and potentially £15m out of pocket – by repeating an error which last year cost it £36m and prompted major reforms to its administration of local government finance.

Last year, the government issued a correction to its top-ups and tariffs formula, after it led to a number of business rate pilots receiving more grant than they were entitled to.

Last week, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government permanent secretary Melanie Dawes wrote to the National Audit Office (NAO) admitting that the incorrect formula was used again this year after officials failed to update it.

In her letter to Sir Amyas Morse, comptroller and auditor general at the NAO, Dawes said: “We are looking into the precise circumstances of how this happened.

“However, it originated from a failure to correct the guidance following last year’s error, rather than a new mistake in our computations.”

The error, which exaggerates the forecast benefit of participating in a pilot, appeared in the formula used to calculate section 31 grant payments to business rates pilots in the ministry’s NNDR1 guidance note.

Dawes admitted some local authorities – especially those participating in a pilot for the first time this year – may have based some element of their budget planning on the incorrect formula.

She said: “Given that the financial year has already started, and particularly since the error in the guidance repeats the same mistake as last year, the secretary of state has exceptionally decided to offer a goodwill payment to those councils who used the incorrect guidance for their financial planning in 2019-20, and where the consequences of doing so could be more difficult to mitigate.”

The cost of the payments is expected to be up to £15m, according to the permanent secretary’s letter.

Pilot authorities have been asked to contact the department by 21 June if they think they would qualify for a payment.

In her letter, Dawes said that the sums involved represent the equivalent of less than 0.2% of spending power for those affected.

Last year, the government admitted that the mistake led to 27 local authorities and the Greater London Authority being over-compensated by £36m in 2018/19.

At that time, former communities secretary Sajid Javid issued a direction to allow the department to ignore the rules and allow councils to keep the cash.

In a statement to Parliament, Javid said officials would “use the corrected methodology to calculate the Section 31 grant compensation due to authorities”.

However, the department omitted to update the original guidance note, and the error was repeated in this year’s NNDR1 form, which was issued to local authorities on 17 December.

The problem came to light when the correct figures for 2019/20 were issued to pilot local authorities in late April.

The repeat of the mistake is doubly embarrassing for the government because it carried out a thorough review of governance processes relating to business rates following the original incident.

The review was carried out by Andrew Hudson, former director general at the Treasury and former chief executive of the Valuation Office Agency,

In April last year, in a letter to the housing, communities and local government committee announcing the review, Javid said “…it is a priority of mine to ensure that the business rates retention system operates as smoothly as possible, with the scope for error minimalised”.

The review included a recommendation that quality control measures should be built into the process at all stages.

It said: “So if, for example, new guidance notes are prepared for a form, these should be checked with local government representatives well ahead of the issue of the form.”

Dawes said that the department had accepted and implemented all of the review’s recommendations, introducing new processes, oversight and approvals over the management of local government finance.

She said “It is, therefore, all the more disappointing that the incorrect formula in the guidance note, which originated from the computation error which was discovered last year, was not corrected before that guidance note was reissued in December 2018.”

The department, Dawes said, is investigating exactly how the mistake was repeated, but she claimed: “I do not believe that it indicates further underlying weaknesses to our systems.”

However, she said she was planning to accelerate and widen the work of a post-implementation review of the changes resulting from Hudson’s review.

Get the Room 151 Newsletter

Room151 Conferences & Events

Share

You may also like...

  • Inter-authority lending rockets by £2bn 11 May, 2017
  • News Roundup: LGPS property exposure, Kent’s tax wrangle, unlawful parking charges, intern profits, Notts highways 28 May, 2015
  • High street report proposes new fund and local initiative to arrest decline 20 Dec, 2018
  • Is it time to pool treasury resources? 16 Mar, 2017

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room 151 8 hours ago

    County introduces new rules after £9.1m funds gaffe: A report to Hertfordshire’s most recent audit committee meeting said the “treasury control failure” had come to light in August, one day after the multi-million-pound redemption was not received.… dlvr.it/RL5DP0 pic.twitter.com/6LvY71zUew

    Room 151 12 hours ago

    News just in - #WorkingtonWoman is believed to represent roughly half the electorate in Workington.

    Room 151 1 day ago

    LGPS urged to put the ‘social’ back into ESG: LGPS committee members and managers have been asked to elevate the importance of the “S” in ESG (environmental, social and governance) to help protect workers’ rights as the world confronts[...] dlvr.it/RL1c9p pic.twitter.com/xv590d3qm8

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Room 151’s top 10 news stories of 2019 room151.co.uk/treasury/room-… #localgov

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Room 151’s top news stories of 2019: As an eventful year for local authority treasurers draws to a close, Room 151 takes a look at the top 10 stories from the sector during 2019. 10. Spending watchdog[...] dlvr.it/RKy49q

    Room 151 6 days ago

    Council files £130m claim against PFI contractor for post-Grenfell estate costs: London Borough of Camden is suing a former PFI partner and its main subcontractors for £130m for costs relating to the evacuation of one of its housing estates the week[...] dlvr.it/RKkR8C pic.twitter.com/zIfQcikMjq

    Room 151 7 days ago

    Review highlights ongoing financial management issues at Northamptonshire: Northamptonshire County Council’s new section 151 officer should draw up plans to repatriate powers from government commissioners amid ongoing problems with financial management,… dlvr.it/RKjLkN pic.twitter.com/tQIxMDawQV

    Room 151 1 week ago

    Doug McMurdo: LGPS, the Stewardship Code, good governance and protecting capital: I have spent the last decade leading Bedfordshire Pension Fund (BPF) as chairman of the pensions committee. We are facing many challenges, not least the reforms that the… dlvr.it/RKfJrD

    Room 151 1 week ago

    Active managers still in the game: Under performance and high costs have given active management a bad press, some of it well deserved. But it appears to be on the brink of a renaissance with some[...] dlvr.it/RKfJjR pic.twitter.com/yyAcm1wSMy

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story London council set to pursue 50/50 development joint venture
  • Next story Kent’s role in Woodford fund trading suspension unclear

© Copyright 2019 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK