• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Government eases reporting burden of revised investment code

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Treasury
  • — 15 Feb, 2018

The government has released the final wording of its revised investment code, including a softening of draft proposals on transparency requirements relating to property investment.

The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) last week published its response to a consultation on its draft proposals, which were released in November.

The rules outline government’s desire to see councils provide more information on such investments, but the final wording has dropped a requirement for the information to be produced in a separate investment strategy.

A government statement on the new guidance said: “The government believes that it is important that local authorities take decisions in an open and transparent manner.

“However, the government does not want to increase the reporting burden on local authorities.

“For this reason the government has revised the guidance to make it clear that providing all the required disclosures are made and are publicly available, local authorities should have the flexibility to decide how to structure that information.”

In addition, the government said that local authorities should have the discretion to set appropriate indicators which allow councillors to assess total exposure from borrowing and investment decisions.

It said: “The final code recognises that if this is the most important principle, then it may not be possible to select indicators that allow comparability between authorities, and therefore this requirement has been removed.”

The government has published non-statutory guidance notes, which outline nine quantitative indicators which it says “allow councillors and the public to assess a local authority’s total risk exposure as a result of its investment decisions”. (see below)

These include the debt to net service expenditure (NSE) ratio, commercial income to NSE ratio, gross and net income and operating costs.

But David Green, strategic director at Arlingclose, said the wording of the guidance and accompanying notes made it unclear how much force the guidance would have.

He said: “I would summarise it as confusion.
 It is not clear whether the bulk of the guidance applies to treasury investments, or not; whether you can borrow for investment property or not; nor whether the nine new indicators are mandatory or not.

“I believe that a number of local authorities are now checking the legal status of the guidance and what happens if they disregard parts of it, especially where one part contradicts another.”

Despite the changes in the final wording to ease transparency burdens, Jo Pitt, local government policy manager at the Chartered Institute of Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA), said: “There is an increase in reporting and any increase in transparency translates into practical challenges when already pressurised staff are asked to deliver more.

“There is some flexibility around the strategies and the timings, which is helpful, but the additional compliance requirements have been noted by CIPFA and we are already looking at ways to support finance professionals.”

Elsewhere in the final code, the government has dropped a proposal to extend the principle of security, liquidity and yield to non-financial investments such as property.

It said: “In recognition that non-financial investments are, by their nature illiquid, and that local authorities may choose to hold onto investments for a number of years, particularly where they are held to contribute to local regeneration objectives, the investment guidance is now explicit that local authorities can determine the relative importance of security, liquidity and yield for different types of investment and can assess liquidity of non-financial assets on a portfolio basis.”

The new code also sees the government sticking with its original proposal to restrict the maximum use life for assets to a maximum of 50 years for the purposes of minimum revenue provision.

However, in response to concerns raised during the consultation, the government will allow councils to select a maximum use life for assets of more than 50 years for PFI debt, and for other investments “where a local authority has an opinion from an appropriately qualified person that an operational asset will deliver benefits for more than 50 years”.

Stephen Sheen, managing director at local government accountancy consultancy Ichabod Industries, said: “The paradox of the MRP statutory guidance is that the more restrictive it gets the more scope authorities have to depart from it in meeting their underlying statutory duty to determine a prudent MRP.

“However, the further authorities move from it, the greater the risk that MHCLG will give up trying to persuade authorities to be reasonable and enforce its own ideas of prudence through legislation.”

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Liability benchmark ‘should not be mandatory’ 29th Apr, 2022
  • 2021 outlook: Knowns and unknowns after a tumultuous year 13th Jan, 2021
  • Investing today: nowhere to hide 20th May, 2022
  • LGPS funds seeking to divest from Russia 3rd Mar, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 3 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 3 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Dan Bates: Settlement reveals fragility of the system and the need to speak up on fair funding
  • Next story Room151 survey probes sustainability of local government finance

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares