• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • TfL latest to face credit-rating downgrade by Moody’s

    May 10, 2022

  • Government proposes ‘fairer, more accurate’ business rates system

    May 10, 2022

  • Queen’s Speech confirms planning reforms

    May 10, 2022

  • 18,000 affordable houses lost through ‘permitted development’

    May 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Portsmouth set to lose £2.5m over cancelled energy company

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Treasury
  • — 15 Aug, 2018

Photo (cropped): PhotoMix/Pixabay, CC0

Portsmouth City Council has dropped plans to create its own energy company at a potential cost of up to £2.5m.

The decision was taken by the council’s cabinet last week, following a review of the business case for the proposed Victory Energy company.

A report from advisors PwC said that an initial 2017 estimate that the company would require £3.8m investment from the council was more likely to be £15.2m.

The PwC review was commissioned after leadership of the council—in which no party has overall control—changed from the Conservatives and UKIP to the Liberal Democrats following local elections in May.

Gerald Vernon-Jackson, Lib Dem leader of the council, said: “The money the council will lose from this will not put extra pressure on future council budgets.

“The previous administration spent money setting the company up, that money has been spent and is gone. We have taken this decision to limit the council’s losses and make sure no further money goes the same way.”

He said that the business model equated to “an open chequebook”, where the council would be required to put in as much cash as necessary to make the company successful.

Vernon-Jackson added: “It is not the role of a council to be effectively acting as a hedge fund and playing roulette with public money.”

Advice from PwC said that the energy company was an “untried and untested business model trying to attract a very inaccessible audience”, he added.

The PwC report said that the company’s projected net margins looked relatively high, particularly given regulatory constraints on future tariff levels.

“Typically, only the Big Six suppliers have experienced positive net margin growth in line with VESL’s projections over the past five years, and we consider that this was driven by the profitability of their ‘sticky’ standard variable tariff customers, soon to be subject to a price cap,” the report said.

Victory Energy is not the first local authority energy company to run into problems. In May, Bristol City Council announced that it had switched its energy contract away from its own standalone energy company to British Gas.

The council said it was forced to award the contract to the Big Six supplier due to procurement rules.

The move came as it was revealed that the authority has ploughed an extra £6.7m into the company, Bristol Energy, since November last year.

Meanwhile, the UK’s sweltering summer has helped Forest Heath District Council beat its estimated returns from a solar farm investment.

In 2016, the council paid £14.5m to acquire the 12.4MW solar farm at Toggam Farm in Lakenheath.

For the second year running, the solar farm has performed marginally better than expected, with generation rising significantly during the recent sunny spell.

After operating costs and recouping some of the capital used to buy the solar farm, the council said it has generated £372,300 towards the funding of services compared to a predicted £330,000.

However, the wisdom of the purchase was questioned by Victor Lukaniuk, an  independent councillor on Suffolk County Council, who told the East Anglian Daily Times: “The solar farm produced a profit of £372,300 during the financial year 2017–2018 on an investment of £14.5m. That is a return of about 2.5% after hefty costs.

“By anybody’s standards that is a pretty miserable return.”

However, Stephen Edwards, cabinet member for resources and performance at the authority, said the solar farm will produce £700,000 to support public services by year 10 of operation, reflecting an annual return of around 5%.

In Suffolk’s annual report for 2017–18, the council reported income from investments was £118,328, less than the £181,000 predicted.

“The under achievement of interest earned was primarily due to reduced funds available for investment following the purchase the solar farm at Toggam Farm,” the report said.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • In praise of the Liability Benchmark 9th May, 2022
  • Loans: The legal checklist for supporting enterprise 24th Sep, 2021
  • No ‘fire sale’ of treasury assets under new Prudential code 8th Oct, 2021
  • CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards: Deadline extended 29th Apr, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 3 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 3 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 4 days ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 4 days ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

    Room151 5 days ago

    Insights and inspiration from LGPS leaders past and present: Four current and former LGPS leaders have recently given powerful and insightful interviews as part of the Fiftyfaces podcast, which showcases inspiring investors and their stories. Hosted by… dlvr.it/SQ53lC pic.twitter.com/IRYMFPxdA2

    Room151 6 days ago

    Rate rise represents ‘fastest increase in borrowing costs in 25 years’: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans analyses the rationale for the Bank of England’s latest rise in the Official Bank Rate and assesses the likely outcome of… dlvr.it/SQ33k3 pic.twitter.com/A81yiS1UgN

    Room151 6 days ago

    The Liability Benchmark, very much unloved at the recent Room151 treasury briefing, receives a much more positive assessment from Jackie Shute. There’s ‘no better tool for treasury portfolio management’, she says. #localgov #finance room151.co.uk/treasury/in-pr…

    Room151 6 days ago

    In praise of the Liability Benchmark: Jackie Shute responds to recent criticisms of the framework used to plan the future borrowing requirements of a local authority. I’m not suggesting that this debate will have the same[...] dlvr.it/SQ2cGf pic.twitter.com/4rqXTpHC9A

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Rebecca McCaffry: Local authorities must transform to survive
  • Next story Government reveals measures to stimulate council house building

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares