• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Inflation ‘biggest concern for LGPS professionals’

    May 20, 2022

  • LGA calls for government support as regulators face staffing issues

    May 19, 2022

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Treasury department faces uncertain future as tri-borough deal crumbles

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Treasury
  • — 30 Mar, 2017

Stephen Cowan. Photo (cropped). Hammersmith & Fulham council, Flickr

Uncertainty hangs over the future of a combined treasury and pensions department following the breakdown of a flagship shared services arrangement once lauded by former Prime Minister David Cameron.

London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham has been unceremoniously ejected from the tri-borough partnership formed with Kensington & Chelsea and Westminster councils in 2011.

Both parties blamed each other for the collapse in the relationship.

Hammersmith & Fulham leader Stephen Cowan said the decision was “evidently a long-planned move” by the two other authorities.

He said: “We’ve had concerns for some time about the value of the ‘tri-borough’, its lack of transparency and its built-in conflicts of interest.

“In our last two budgets, Hammersmith & Fulham council found £31m in savings but the ‘tri-borough’ contributed no more than £200,000 of that, less than one percent.

“Problems with tri-borough contracts, procured by Westminster City Council, have cost Hammersmith & Fulham over £5m, including the botched contract for special needs transport that put our disabled children at risk.”

However, Westminster leader Nickie Aiken, said that although she would not have chosen to end the tri-borough arrangements, the councils were left with no option.

She said: “Both the leader of Kensington & Chelsea and I feel we are unable to continue with tri-borough when we have a partner that we do not believe is committed to it, as we are, and appears to be making their own plans to leave, without any formal discussions.”

A report to Westminster’s cabinet on Monday said that it had become apparent that Hammersmith & Fulham was making alternative plans to create its own department which would take in adult social care, public health and children services — currently shared.

Cllr Aiken said: “We can’t have that uncertainty for staff and these vital services which is why, with much regret, we have taken the very reluctant decision to terminate the joint arrangements for children’s services, adult social care and public health.”

However, she did not mention the future of the shared treasury and pensions function.

This team is understood to have a headcount of seven — one team leader plus one treasury and one pensions staff member for each borough.

A spokesman for Westminster Council told Room151: “It is too early to comment upon any particular team, but we are doing all we can to keep staff informed.”

Labour opposition councillors at Westminster said that Hammersmith & Fulham had little alternative but to look for other arrangements after delays in introducing a back office tri-borough contract with BT to provide billing, pay and pensions administration.

Cllr David Boothroyd, Labour finance spokesperson at Westminster, said: “Westminster has been done in by its own hype. Starting off with sensible proposals to share back-office staff and integrate services with neighbouring councils, they let a grand vision take priority over the practical.”

The tri-borough arrangements were praised by former prime minister David Cameron in 2011, who said shared services were a way for councils to avoid cutting front-line services.

He told the House of Commons: “Three large councils are coming together and saving £35m because they are sharing back-office services, executive teams and so on.

“Frankly, if they can do it, as large councils that have big responsibilities, many other councils should be doing it in London and elsewhere.

“Until we see that happening, I do not think it is realistic to say that it is necessary for councils to cut front-line services.”

Cllr Warwick Lightfoot, cabinet member for finance and strategy at Kensington & Chelsea, told Room151 that the two remaining councils would continue to work together and were open to other authorities joining the shared service arrangements.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • PFI, the end of LIBOR and the arrivel of SONIA 26th Oct, 2021
  • Impact Awards: Shortlist revealed 2nd Jun, 2021
  • Back to the future for the PWLB 18th May, 2022
  • Guarded welcome to Prudential Code revisions 28th Jan, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    2022 LGPS valuations: difficult discussions in uncertain times: Michelle Doman looks at the impact of inflationary pressures, the war in Ukraine, climate risk and Covid-19 on employer contributions. At the start of 2022, for Local Government Pension… dlvr.it/SQlvy9 pic.twitter.com/Dd0lrHjWNb

    Room151 2 days ago

    Investing today: nowhere to hide: Partner Content: Alex Stanley from Ardea Investment Management suggests that investors have few places to hide amid a synchronised sell-off in both bonds and equities. However, there are catalysts that[...] dlvr.it/SQlNVC pic.twitter.com/KkGGnduzPL

    Room151 3 days ago

    Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment: The Treasury has released new guidance that restricts local authorities’ access to Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) advances if there is a “more than negligible risk” of a council’s… dlvr.it/SQhLTV pic.twitter.com/vBsS7xMJdb

    Room151 3 days ago

    Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers: There has been a mixed reaction to the government’s legislative plans to strengthen its intervention powers over local authority finances. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill has proposed… dlvr.it/SQhLMB pic.twitter.com/50foWxpPGs

    Room151 3 days ago

    Post-Brexit struggles for national and local government regulators. @LGAcomms @NAOorguk Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/lga-call… #Brexit #government pic.twitter.com/s3c8ySGy5G

    Room151 3 days ago

    CIPFA: a question of transparency: Roman Haluszczak’s campaign for publication of the independent report into the collapse of CIPFA’s London Counter Fraud Hub has been rejected again by the institute. He is now calling for[...] dlvr.it/SQgC5V pic.twitter.com/08fWsHFF4g

    Room151 4 days ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 4 days ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 4 days ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 4 days ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 4 days ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 5 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Essex awards £150m infrastructure mandate
  • Next story News round-up: Brexit role for councils, LGPS monitoring contract, road repairs and council tax rises

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares