• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Stephen Sheen: Public interest in Prudential Framework has provided a worrying wobble

0
  • by Stephen Sheen
  • in 151 News · Stephen Sheen · Technical
  • — 9 Apr, 2019

When the Prudential Code was being developed, there was no expectation that it was going to be a document that was going to change the world. Its function was largely to provide assurance to the four national administrations that proposals allowing local authorities to develop capital programmes wholly on the basis of whether their consequences were affordable out of future budgets would have a happy outcome.

As a compact between central and local government, guaranteeing the indulgence of the former and the good behaviour of the latter, the code’s contents do not generally move far beyond statements of the obvious.  They were largely what any reasonable capital finance professional would come up with if asked to define the rules for prudent behaviour.

It is therefore possible for an authority to operate effectively under the Prudential Framework without any detailed knowledge of the code’s provisions.  But since the foundation of the framework, it has been the understanding that if governments lose confidence in the code, the whole framework is at risk.

A number of recent news stories have caused the framework a worrying wobble:

  • public worries about the use of capital receipts to fund redundancies
  • MHCLG concern over compliance with the statutory guidance covering investment properties
  • Peterborough City Council’s proposals for applying capital receipts to minimise MRP

What these wobbles have in common is an unusual level of public interest and some confusion as to how the Prudential Framework should operate, resulting in plenty of debate but much of it ill-focused.

One of the big advances of the Prudential Framework was to break down the distinction between revenue and capital resources. Previously, annual capital budgets were capped by a limit on the new borrowing that the government would allow to be taken out in a particular year. When the framework was implemented in 2004, all spending decisions could be made on an equal footing focusing on their impact on the revenue budget, with capital payments resulting in revenue charges established by cost amortising the cost over the life of the relevant asset.

The only substantial area that remains ring-fenced is capital receipts. The proceeds from asset sales are generally restricted to being applied to new capital investment or set aside to finance past capital expenditure. In the commercial world, entities would be able to treat any surplus of proceeds over undepreciated cost as unrestricted income.

To a degree this restriction makes sense, in that it prevents authorities from using one-off gains to cover ongoing service spending needs, but there are two issues with this:

  • if the asset disposed of was surplus to requirements and its cost had been financed, what would be wrong with doing it?
  • the policy can lead to the accumulation of capital receipts balances, whose use is limited by the fact that new assets will generate running costs that are not affordable from revenue budgets

In England and Wales, the flexible use of the capital receipts initiative was designed to restore some harmony.  Newly-generated receipts can be used to fund revenue expenditure intended to secure ongoing savings or to transform service delivery to reduce costs.

In this context, redundancy costs are a prime candidate for consideration
— exceptional costs that will reduce the wage bill on a permanent basis.  The idea of using capital receipts to meet these costs is wholly reasonable.  Public worries about flexible use should therefore focus separately and more specifically on the appropriateness of the asset disposal or the acceptability of the redundancy proposals. Bringing the two together is not an escalation of either issue.

The greater risk will be in relation to circumstances where capital receipts are being used to support revenue expenditure without a proper assurance that savings will be generated. Without this assurance, there could be a double whammy of giving revenue an unsustainable one-off prop and not freeing any future revenue headroom to finance the capital expenditure that could otherwise have been met from the capital receipts.

Problems might also arise with the framework’s propensity to throw up capital receipts where they have no substance as a new resource, such as with certain capital loan repayments and sale and leaseback deals.  If unsupported receipts were applied to revenue expenditure, they would fix a permanent black hole in an authority’s balance sheet.

The NAO’s Auditor Guidance Note for 2018/19 expects auditors in England to focus on the application of the scheme in their audits, so we may be in for several months of scrutiny of flexible use.

Tensions also arise under the Prudential Framework with the Government’s approach to statutory guidance. It is clear that the guidance issued in England and Wales has an objective of limiting the overall amount of borrowing that an authority takes out. For local authorities this is a secondary consideration, with borrowing being limited by the affordability of the consequential interest payments from future revenues.

In meeting their statutory duties to act prudently, authorities will commonly come across parts of the statutory guidance that are expecting them to be over-prudent and contrary to the fundamental “who benefits pays” principle. For instance, there is an expectation that loans to support capital expenditure will be financed even where there is no evidence that the loan will not be repaid in full, and even where it is secured by effective collateral.

Any authority complying completely with the statutory guidance will therefore, to a degree, be working to its own detriment.

With everyone aware that “MHCLG is watching you”, there is pressure on authorities to avoid departures or to have very strong grounds for doing something different. In this respect, the reported policy of Peterborough appears sensible – to reduce the MRP that would otherwise have been made in years when significant amounts of capital receipts have been set aside.  This is based on an understanding that the proper measure of prudence should be where you arrive at at the end of the year (in terms of unfinanced capital expenditure), rather than what you have done during it.

However, there are plenty of other rumoured goings-on that don’t sound particularly sensible. I would reiterate the view I expressed in a previous article – the Prudential Framework is so complicated that there are no experts, just people who know a bit more than others. If you don’t understand what your authority is being recommended to do, don’t presume that the person telling you has that much more of an understanding.

If the Prudential Framework is going to thrive and the Prudential Code survive, then lashings of scepticism should be encouraged from members, officers, external auditors, the media and people’s auditors. But prudent good practice should always be defended, no matter how much explaining it might take.

Stephen Sheen is the managing director of Ichabod’s Industries, a consultancy providing technical accounting support to local government.

Get the Room 151 Newsletter

Room151 Conferences & Events



Share

You may also like...

  • 100 NHS trusts demand backdated business rates relief 100 NHS trusts demand backdated business rates relief 21 Jan, 2016
  • Councils budget for 21% increase in spending on housing Councils budget for 21% increase in spending on housing 13 Jun, 2019
  • South Yorks, RBS bad bank, Scottish Futures Trust, Probation pensions, Homeless fund South Yorks, RBS bad bank, Scottish Futures Trust, Probation pensions, Homeless fund 16 Aug, 2013
  • London seeks combined authority powers London seeks combined authority powers 11 Sep, 2014

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 16 hours ago

    The vaccine may help settle cash flows but inflation remains a risk: Sponsored article: Lauren Sewell examines the prospects for long-term borrowing as Brexit settles and vaccines are deployed against Covid-19. On the 9th October 2019 Whitehall sent… dlvr.it/RqZXCr pic.twitter.com/PzgOZOGQ0k

    Room151 16 hours ago

    ESG in liquidity: Sponsored article: Gavin Haywood looks at the integration of ESG in Federated Hermes’ money market funds. Federated Hermes has over 300 public sector clients invested in our AAA rated money[...] dlvr.it/RqZX5f pic.twitter.com/E87sBXsay8

    Room151 2 days ago

    New realities of investing cash and liquidity: “What to do now?”: Sponsored article: Brian Buck looks at the “unique challenge” for cash management strategies. As investors assess the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their business, levels of cash and… dlvr.it/RqVbk9 pic.twitter.com/ZElVASmEUV

    Room151 2 days ago

    Extra finance promised by the government receives a broad welcome: Sponsored article: The financial pressures facing local authorities this year continue to pose challenges for council treasurers. While the launch of the UK’s Covid-19 vaccination… dlvr.it/RqTzTF pic.twitter.com/HCjH0pyHR5

    Room151 2 days ago

    A savvy approach to managing your cash: Sponsored article: Caroline Hedges examines the need for active cash management to achieve a higher than average return. Last year saw the already mountainous pile of negative-yielding debt around the[...] dlvr.it/RqTzMK pic.twitter.com/uP0RQYTJLt

    Room151 3 days ago

    Putting alternatives at the heart of multi-asset portfolios: Sponsored article: Nick Edwardson looks at the assets that provide the “most attractive opportunities”. We believe that asset allocation is the primary driver of investment returns and that the… dlvr.it/RqQ2Qt pic.twitter.com/WLBzvRRRUQ

    Room151 3 days ago

    Thriving in the pandemic: Avoiding the stragglers: Sponsored article: George Crowdy looks at the sectors providing opportunities for sustainable investment. Throughout much of 2020, we talked about why sustainable investing has thrived in the pandemic,… dlvr.it/RqQ2NQ pic.twitter.com/dxiPWKFsPl

    Room151 3 days ago

    The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark: Sponsored article: Amy Browne examines the importance of investing in mental health in the workplace. We are living through a public health emergency in more ways than one. Physical health[...] dlvr.it/RqQ2Jx pic.twitter.com/o6yRSCX3oF

    Room151 4 days ago

    Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy: Sponsored article: Hetal Mehta looks at the impact of Brexit on economic prospects. Four and a half years after voting to leave the EU, on Christmas Eve the UK finally[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDt pic.twitter.com/No62srfE8h

    Room151 4 days ago

    Cash dethroned: The quest for liquid yield: Sponsored article: Peter Hunt and George Carne ask how treasury departments can balance the need for yield and liquidity. The massive stimulus and waves of liquidity provided by central banks[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDj pic.twitter.com/05g6Zhu1kU

    Room151 4 days ago

    Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point: The severe pressure on local government budgets now means section 151 officers confront a tricky call on  whether they can make a judgement on the robustness… dlvr.it/RqLBDV pic.twitter.com/vTAbDKFzkI

    Room151 4 weeks ago

    PWLB Consultation: Analysis straight from Dickens: Helen Radall and Paul McDermott present a legal examination of the new PWLB borrowing rules as Charles Dickens might have imagined it. Free and easy PWLB (“Marley” to his friends)[...] dlvr.it/RnmwLq pic.twitter.com/yFxcPrQqEG

    Room151 4 weeks ago

    Room151’s top stories from a momentous year: 2020 was the year in which local government grappled with Covid-19, funding strains, controversy over borrowing rules and the threat of financial collapse. It has been an exhausting and historic[...] dlvr.it/RnlpZg pic.twitter.com/g3myNyox6J

    Room151 4 weeks ago

    Tracy Bingham: 2020, a year best forgotten but also one of learning: Many will rush to erase 2020 from their memories but, writes Tracy Bingham, there were also many lessons about finance teams, strategic planning and leadership. 2020: A year we’d… dlvr.it/RnlpY2 pic.twitter.com/m7G1krrtCu

    Room151 1 month ago

    Settlement must address ‘precarious’ local government finances: Dan Bates crosses his fingers for “no nasty surprises” in this week’s funding settlement but argues the “bigger prize” is post-Covid financial certainty. Thursday (17 December) should be the… dlvr.it/Rnj9dG pic.twitter.com/KLKjjuBqJE

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB consultation: Big change on the way but there are ‘grey areas’ and opportunities: The consultation on PWLB borrowing has concluded creating a new landscape for funding property acquisition. Our experts look at the implications. Tracie Langley The… dlvr.it/RndRvJ pic.twitter.com/KEqXEBmEfq

    Room151 1 month ago

    2021: Better income outcomes?: Sponsored article: Investors should be mindful of structural challenges posed to income generation as a result of rapid thematic change. Jon Bell looks at the prospects for the coming year.[...] dlvr.it/RndRsw pic.twitter.com/TxVk8aXkMq

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story CIPFA FM code to seek greater assurance and transparency
  • Next story Airport tax mooted as Birmingham Commonwealth Games funding solution

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK