• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’

    August 5, 2022

  • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades

    August 4, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data

1
  • by Aysha Gilmore
  • in 151 News · Funding
  • — 30 Jun, 2022

Photo: Shutterstock

Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these cities.

London Councils, an umbrella body that represents 32 boroughs and the City of London Corporation, said that the capital’s population had been “significantly undercounted” in the census. Similarly, Manchester City Council suggested that its population could have been underestimated by as much as 33,000 people.

The census, undertaken by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), takes place every ten years and is one of the factors used by government in determining funding allocations for councils. The most recent census – in March 2021 – took pace during the third national lockdown caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Impact of pandemic

Cllr Georgia Gould, chair of London Councils, said the underestimation was due to many students, young people on furlough and migrant workers from abroad who had temporarily relocated to family homes outside of the capital at the time of the census.

She said: “Census 2021 took place during the extraordinary circumstances of the Covid-19 pandemic and a national lockdown, so this snapshot data must be treated with extreme caution.”

The census data suggested that London’s total population in March 2021 was almost 300,000 (3%) lower than the ONS’s previous population estimate for 2021, with some boroughs’ figures almost a quarter (24%) lower.

The problem was most apparent in inner London boroughs according to the analysis, with Camden and Westminster joining a campaign to find the “Lost Londoners”.

Gould added: “Accurate census data matters for Londoners because it helps determine government funding allocations to local authorities. Billions of pounds for frontline services are at stake.”

London Councils estimated that around £4bn of government funding to London local authorities relies directly or indirectly on census population figures.

Cllr Bev Craig, leader of Manchester City Council, said that Manchester’s population had also been underestimated – by potentially 33,000 people due to the census missing people in their 20s linked to the city’s large student population.

She said: “We know that Manchester is growing quickly and to receive less budget than our population requires could have a massive bearing on our ability to provide services to our residents.”

Both London Councils and Manchester City Council said they were keen to work with the ONS to ensure that the census accurately reflects their populations.

Accurate census data matters for Londoners because it helps determine government funding allocations to local authorities. Billions of pounds for frontline services are at stake.

High response rate

A spokesperson for the ONS said: We have full confidence in our census estimates. We achieved a fantastic response rate of 97% – and over 88% in every local authority – and undertook the most comprehensive quality assurance ever, including involving local authorities for the first time.

“We would always expect differences with the Mid Year Population estimates from the year prior to the census. The main purpose of the census is to ‘rebase’ our estimates of size of the population.

For some students and in some urban areas, the ONS said there was evidence that the Covid-19 pandemic did result in changes to where people lived. These changes might have been temporary for some and permanent for others.

“We recognise the population continues to change so, using a variety of data sources, we will be providing more frequent, relevant, and timely statistics to allow us to understand population change in local areas this year and beyond,” the spokesperson added.

—————

FREE weekly newsletters
Subscribe to Room151 Newsletters

Room151 LinkedIn Community
Join here

Monthly Online Treasury Briefing
Sign up here with a .gov.uk email address

Room151 Webinars
Visit the Room151 channel

Share

You may also like...

  • Waste authority to issue green bond through UKMBA 2nd Feb, 2022
  • Liability benchmark ‘should not be mandatory’ 29th Apr, 2022
  • Ten of the most innovative council-run housing projects 25th Jan, 2022
  • WECA mayor fails in bid to force LGPS fund to divest entirely from fossil fuels 6th Jul, 2022

1 Comment

  1. When will the Census 2021 Results Impact Housing Numbers? | Decisions, Decisions, Decisions says:
    2022/07/11 at 10:26

    […] The big mistake is not understanding that they are not comparing like for like. The mid year population estimates include an allowance for underenumeration (that is undercounting people that exist), funding and the standard method depend on the mid year population estimates NOT the raw first census results. . Some of the issues were unique to the 2021 census such as holding the census in the midst of a pandemic when many short term contract workers and students were away; but much of this is systemic especially in London where there are larger numbers of inherently difficult to count households such as from ethnic minorities. Newham for example claimed from its own data on GP rolls and school rolls that the 2011 census undercounted its population by as much as 20,000. Many Boroughs are making similar claims now. […]

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
    • Consultation opens into care charging reforms
    • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’
    • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades
    • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 11 hours ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 1 day ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 1 day ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 2 days ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 5 days ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 6 days ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 1 week ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

    Room151 1 week ago

    The case for residential investment: income, impact and resilience: Partner Content: Emma Gullifer from Columbia Threadneedle discusses the options for pension funds looking to invest in residential property including the Build-to-Rent market.… dlvr.it/SVzKwN pic.twitter.com/hdgZ4zKt4H

    Room151 1 week ago

    Draft accounts: delays continue despite deadline dash: Dan Bates discusses the latest data on the publication of local authority accounts and examines why so many councils missed the 31 July deadline. Sunday 31 July 2022 was the[...] dlvr.it/SVx2ZT pic.twitter.com/gdELhD3Yis

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement
  • Next story Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK