• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’

    August 5, 2022

  • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades

    August 4, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Kingston looks to set up company to buy £68m of commercial property

1
  • by Jim Dunton
  • in 151 News · Resources
  • — 27 Jun, 2019

The Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames is planning to set up a property investment company to oversee a planned multi-million-pound investment drive aimed at supporting council services.

In a report to members of the council’s finance and partnerships committee, director of growth Nazeya Hussain said the objective of the company would be to invest £68m in commercial property to “generate long-term revenue income streams” that created “profit for purpose”.

The cash would be borrowed from the Public Works Loan Board and invested in the company for the use of an “experienced private-sector investment fund manager” who the council would appoint.

Under a “base case scenario” referred to in the report, the net income return to the council over 50 years was £637,000 a year.

Kingston already has around 150 commercial properties let to third parties, delivering a gross annual income of around £5.4m a year, the committee was told.

But Hussain’s report said that the borough’s existing commercial property portfolio contained a number of “significant risk factors” because it was not balanced across a range of sectors and classes, was focused on the south-west London borough itself, and relied on just two assets for 65% of the income.

She told committee members that the new company’s assets would reduce the geographical risk of the borough’s current holdings by investing across the wider south-east region.

Hussain said that advice from law firm Trowers & Hamlins was that Kingston should set up its own incorporated company structure with a holding company as the parent body and the investment company as a subsidiary.

Neither the creation of a single special-purpose vehicle nor an unincorporated model, where the joint investment board remained within the council’s constitutional structure, were not recommended.

The preferred model would include oversight from an elected-member shareholder committee that would meet in public.

Councillors would be eligible to be board members of the holding company board.

Hussain said the structure gave the council “maximum flexibility” and was “highly resilient to potential political, corporate, constitutional or governance changes.

She said the incorporated company structure could be added to with other vehicles the council may want to create.

“Shares in companies can be transferred to other parties, such as another local authority, a combined authority, or a private-sector investor,” she said.

“Assets and potential liabilities are contained within separate legal entities; companies can be wound up in the event of a desired exit and new subsidiary companies can be established relatively quickly to fulfil different objectives.”

Hussain’s report said that the legal advice was that while local authorities had general powers to acquire and dispose of land, but when this was done for a profit it was necessary to do it through a company.

The report also referred to recent “controversy” in relation to councils borrowing to invest in property outside their administrative area.

In March this year Room 151 reported that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government was concerned about the extent to which some councils were complying with the requirements of its recently-updated investment code.

Earlier this month, official government data indicated a year-on-year increase in councils’ investment in commercial property.

The provisional outturn figures showed council spending on acquiring land and buildings increased by 4.5% to reach £4.21bn in 2018/19.

Hussain’s report noted that current government investment guidance, legislation, and the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) prudential code stipulates that councils should not borrow “solely for the purpose” of purchasing investment properties.

But it said such moves “may be justifiable on a case-by-case basis”, subject to due diligence and risk analysis.

“We would also suggest a value-for-money comparison as to whether the yield that can be obtained from investing in the particular property compares favourably with other ways in which the council’s funds might be deployed,” she said.

Hussain added that further legal advice, from QC James Goudie of 11 King’s Bench Walk, suggested that special justification for borrowing to invest in commercial property could include a demonstrable need to fund a particular project with the revenue generated – rather than funding a general budget gap.

Other justifications could include a project and expenditure on it being in line with council policy, or the borrowing being demonstrated to be in line with the council’s financial strategies.

The report said the nearer to the borough any new commercial property investment took place, the more likely it would be that the investment could be demonstrated to “benefit the council in ways that do not solely comprise a return on investment”.

If this week’s meeting approves the proposals, they will go to a full council meeting next month.

Earlier this year, Kingston resolved to push ahead with an £800m joint venture with developer Countryside Properties that will regenerate a 1970s estate.

Get the Room 151 Newsletter

Room151 Conferences & Events



Share

You may also like...

  • New intervention powers and borrowing restrictions ‘credit positive’, says Moody’s 7th Jun, 2022
  • Levelling up’s ‘tyranny of competitive funding’ 25th Mar, 2022
  • DLUHC proposes devolution deal in York and North Yorkshire 2nd Aug, 2022
  • Fears that members are ‘opting out of LGPS over cost-of-living crisis’ 14th Jun, 2022

1 Comment

  1. David Green says:
    2019/06/28 at 08:14

    Seems like a lot of risk for a base case 0.9% revenue return over 50 years. You could buy a government bond for 1.4% guaranteed. I wonder how remote the scenarios are that lead to this project being a drag on the revenue account?

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
    • Consultation opens into care charging reforms
    • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’
    • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades
    • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 hours ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 1 day ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 2 days ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 3 days ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 6 days ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 7 days ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 1 week ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

    Room151 1 week ago

    The case for residential investment: income, impact and resilience: Partner Content: Emma Gullifer from Columbia Threadneedle discusses the options for pension funds looking to invest in residential property including the Build-to-Rent market.… dlvr.it/SVzKwN pic.twitter.com/hdgZ4zKt4H

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story The proposed changes to the LGPS: local valuation cycles and exits
  • Next story Council predicts £5.5m budget overspend after a single month

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares