• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’

    August 5, 2022

  • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades

    August 4, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Council report casts doubt on emergence of competitive PWLB alternatives

0
  • by Mark Smulian
  • in 151 News · Treasury
  • — 27 Nov, 2019

A report by London Borough of Haringey finance officers has sounded the alarm over the options for councils to find cheaper lenders than the Public Works Loans Board (PWLB) following the increase in its lending rate.

The report said councils would face a pricing risk until the market expanded enough to compete with the PWLB, something the report warned might never happen.

SAVE THE DATE – LATIF NORTH
March 25th, 2020, Manchester
Council treasury investment & borrowing

Haringey earlier this year proposed to use large amounts of PWLB borrowing to help fund for a £1bn council housing programme, but the report warned alternatives to the PWLB “will bring with them a significantly elevated resourcing requirement for Haringey officers, and will be far more costly administratively”.

The PWLB in October increased the cost of new borrowing for local authorities by 1 percentage point, to gilts +1.8%.

Haringey has borrowed some 70% of its requirements from the PWLB with the rest coming from other local authorities. “This must now be reviewed in line with the change,” the report warned.

While the council’s treasury management strategy permitted borrowing from a number of sources “it was not anticipated that any alternatives to PWLB would be utilised given the low cost of PWLB funding previously”.

A further attraction of the PWLB had been “the low administration cost associated with raising funding, which was done by a simple phone call from officers when new borrowing was arranged”.

The “significantly elevated resourcing requirement” of dealing with other lenders would depend on whether the currently underdeveloped market for lending to councils expanded now that the PWLB’s rates were less attractive.

“The market which provides alternative funding to the PWLB for local authorities is not well developed,” the report noted.

“Only a handful of authorities have raised funds via alternative routes, as PWLB rates have previously been at levels that competitors could not offer. This is now likely to change, and the market is likely to reassess the possibility of lending to councils.“

The report though explained that with the PWLB benchmark having increased to gilts + 1.8% there was a risk “that the market will increase pricing for funding to just below this new benchmark, for example, a lender who had previously been willing to lend to councils at gilts +1.2% could now increase their offer to gilts +1.7%: just below the new PWLB rate.

“This pricing risk will prevail until it becomes clear that the market for alternatives to PWLB is so developed that lenders have to offer significant discounts to the PWLB benchmark rate in an attempt to compete with one another.

“It is unclear at this stage whether this level of competition will ever materialise, and it is likely to take some time to do so.”

Alternative lenders so far appeared limited in what they offered. The report said talks with high street banks suggested Haringey could borrow only for up to seven years at rates that compared favourably to PWLB.

“This is too short a duration for this to form a major component of Haringey’s revised borrowing strategy, where the majority of funds borrowed will be in excess of 20 years,” it said.

Institutional investors might lend at between gilts +1.2 and +1.8%, or lower, for more than 20 years via private placement agreements, the report said, but entering into these would be administratively complex, and anyway limited to £50m each, so forcing Haringey to do multiple deals to meet its borrowing requirement.

Issuing a bond would require the council to first secure a credit rating.

Although a few local authorities have done this, the report said it would be “an involved, lengthy and costly process” with no guarantee that rates offered would be lower than those of the PWLB.

The report concluded that it was clear that alternatives to the PWLB would require “far more involved due diligence processes, borrowing will likely have to be done in large tranches, rather than taking small amounts incrementally…and rates offered will differ depending on the financial position of individual authorities”.

The Room151 Weekly Newsletter covers local government treasury and pension investment, funding, development, resources and technical finance. Register here. 

The LGPS Quarterly Briefing focuses purely on pension fund investment. Register here.

Share

You may also like...

  • Clampdown on commercialism ‘could push some councils to the cliff edge’ 4th Feb, 2022
  • Treasurers back multi-asset funds and property but pessimistic about yields 28th Jan, 2021
  • MOTB speakers and attendees call for permanent IFRS 9 override 27th May, 2022
  • DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts 4th Aug, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
    • Consultation opens into care charging reforms
    • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’
    • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades
    • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 hours ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 5 hours ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 1 day ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 2 days ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 3 days ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 6 days ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 7 days ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 1 week ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

    Room151 1 week ago

    The case for residential investment: income, impact and resilience: Partner Content: Emma Gullifer from Columbia Threadneedle discusses the options for pension funds looking to invest in residential property including the Build-to-Rent market.… dlvr.it/SVzKwN pic.twitter.com/hdgZ4zKt4H

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story How do the main party manifestos affect local government finance?
  • Next story Lack of benefits prompts shared services rethink

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares