• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • TfL latest to face credit-rating downgrade by Moody’s

    May 10, 2022

  • Government proposes ‘fairer, more accurate’ business rates system

    May 10, 2022

  • Queen’s Speech confirms planning reforms

    May 10, 2022

  • 18,000 affordable houses lost through ‘permitted development’

    May 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

MHCLG ‘concerned’ over councils’ investment code compliance

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Technical · Treasury
  • — 26 Mar, 2019

Some councils are failing to comply with revised investment code requirements on proportionality and minimum revenue provision (MRP), according to a senior government official.

Speaking to a session at Room151’s LATIF North last week, Gareth Caller, head of the local government finance unit at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government,  said the government is currently undertaking a review of how councils are interpreting the revised code, released last year.

He said  that although the review – covering treasury management strategies and capital strategies – is only a third of the way through, his team has raised concerns about the approach of a number of councils.

“We found some genuine concerns in [relation to] proportionality and MRP guidance,” Caller said.

“There were some strategies that said ‘we disagree with the guidance so we are going to disregard it’ or chose to, particularly on proportionality, select indicators that clearly didn’t align to the intention of introducing the concept of proportionality in the underlying guidance.”

Caller said that it was for every local authority to decide the approach to take and that he was aware that guidance does not have the same force as regulation and legislation.

But he warned that “there is an expectation in law that local authorities will comply with statutory guidance and that if they depart from it they will explain why.

“And those explanations were not always transparent where local authorities had chosen to disregard the guidance.”

During the question and answer session, Caller was asked to explain the ways in which councils had been disregarding guidance on MRP.

He said: “In some cases they have been setting the MRP for longer than 50 years without linking that either to the length of a PFI deal or it being for a service asset.

“There are also cases of over-payment or of payment holidays due to changes in methodology rather than because an over-payment reserve has been built up over previous years.”

Also speaking during the session, David Green, strategic director at treasury adviser Arlingclose said: “We see some people who have bought an asset, and say ‘we intend to sell at a higher price so there will be no cost so we will make no MRP at all’. Most people would agree that is not what the guidance was meant to achieve.”

On proportionality, Caller said the government had considered introducing a limit that councils would be allowed to borrow up to, but had disregarded the idea.

He said: “Fundamentally, we don’t want there to be a level that everyone feels safe to borrow up to.

“We think that each local authority has to decide what is right for them given their risk appetite and risk mitigation strategies and take responsibility for that.”

Caller also raised worries about strategies which contained large sections of text cut and pasted from templates provided by their treasury advisers.

He said: “If someone has used a template, the question is how much thought they have put into it. “They may have done due diligence and made sure everything is covered, but if someone has used a template it is difficult to know if they have done that.”

Caller also said that some of the strategies his team had examined had also been unclear about the transparency of council investments into wholly-owned housing companies.

He said: “We recognise that [housing companies] can serve a dual purpose of income generation and delivery of objectives in relation to service and housing delivery, and therefore a higher degree of risk might be acceptable.

“One of the areas of good practice is to disclose that – but people weren’t always disclosing [that] the investments might have a different risk appetite.”

Caller also said that some strategies were not clear that housing companies were risking money lent to them by their parent authorities.

The department has also discovered big variations in how well councils are presenting their investment and capital strategies online.

He said: “For every capital strategy, for every investment strategy that is really easy to find there is one that is buried either somewhere on page 437 of the budget council papers or in cabinet or executive papers with a summary report presented to cabinet.

“One of the key aims behind the guidance was transparency and [this] was about encouraging local authorities to explain why local authorities were doing what they were doing.”

Get the Room 151 Newsletter

Room151 Conferences & Events

Share

You may also like...

  • Richard Harbord: September accounts sign-off a ‘fantasy’ at many councils 10th May, 2021
  • Stephen Sheen: Audit predictions 2021 27th Jan, 2021
  • Is local government funding “broken”? 12th Feb, 2021
  • Impact Awards: Councils can make ‘game-changing’ difference to carbon management 22nd Apr, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 6 hours ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 7 hours ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 1 day ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 1 day ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

    Room151 2 days ago

    Insights and inspiration from LGPS leaders past and present: Four current and former LGPS leaders have recently given powerful and insightful interviews as part of the Fiftyfaces podcast, which showcases inspiring investors and their stories. Hosted by… dlvr.it/SQ53lC pic.twitter.com/IRYMFPxdA2

    Room151 3 days ago

    Rate rise represents ‘fastest increase in borrowing costs in 25 years’: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans analyses the rationale for the Bank of England’s latest rise in the Official Bank Rate and assesses the likely outcome of… dlvr.it/SQ33k3 pic.twitter.com/A81yiS1UgN

    Room151 3 days ago

    The Liability Benchmark, very much unloved at the recent Room151 treasury briefing, receives a much more positive assessment from Jackie Shute. There’s ‘no better tool for treasury portfolio management’, she says. #localgov #finance room151.co.uk/treasury/in-pr…

    Room151 3 days ago

    In praise of the Liability Benchmark: Jackie Shute responds to recent criticisms of the framework used to plan the future borrowing requirements of a local authority. I’m not suggesting that this debate will have the same[...] dlvr.it/SQ2cGf pic.twitter.com/4rqXTpHC9A

    Room151 3 days ago

    Room151 launches survey on IFRS 9 override and MRP impact: Room151 has launched a survey to gauge the sentiment in local government on two important issues: the IFRS 9 statutory override and the consultation on Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP). The[...] dlvr.it/SQ1VT7 pic.twitter.com/ahPEiLoFNC

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Kingston set to push ahead with £800m regeneration JV
  • Next story Bonds agency set to drop collective liability requirement

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares