• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Repayment penalties for PWLB loans should be scrapped, demands analyst

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Treasury
  • — 10 May, 2018

Treasury-imposed barriers to councils repaying historic high-interest loans from the Public Works Loan Board should be removed, a financial analyst has claimed.

In an article on his Risky Finance website, Nick Dunbar criticised the high penalties faced by local authorities who want to refinance borrowing taken out before the financial crisis at rates of 5% or above.

Risky Finance estimates that the current early repayment cost to councils on their PWLB loans is around £29bn, on top of total borrowing of £62bn.

Dunbar said that early repayment penalties introduced in 2007 hurt the poorest authorities — those that borrowed the most before the crash — and fuelled a recent trend for better-off councils to borrow at cheap rates for commercial property investment.

He told Room151: “Our analysis shows that councils whose repayment penalties are low — reflecting the fact they hadn’t borrowed much before the financial crisis — have been more likely to take out new PWLB loans.

“They include authorities such as Spelthorne, Runnymede and Woking; all wealthy areas that have used cheap government funding to make speculative investments in commercial property.”

Dunbar said the government should stop treating PWLB loans to local authorities in the same way as loans in the private sector work, and should scrap repayment penalties.

“After all,” he said, “if taxpayers’ money is being shunted from central to local government and back again, why is a market rate necessary?

“Isn’t the point of central government that it can insulate small players, such as councils, from forces such as interest rate shifts, which they can’t control?”

Christian Wall, director at local authority financial adviser PFM, backed Dunbar’s argument.

He said: “The government should lift the penalty regime, at least for those councils who took loans before 2007. Given local authorities are under severe pressure, it is a slight irony that the government insists they can’t refinance their loans to save them money.”

However, Mark Pickering, director at treasury adviser Arlingclose, said that the financial penalties for repayment had been introduced for good reason, and could see the argument for their retention.

He said: “There are two issues here: the movement in interest rates over the period and the premium for early repayment.

“In terms of interest rates, councils borrowed longer term at times when rates were higher than now because they put a value on certainty. They had opportunities from the first anniversary of taking those loans to refinance.”

Pickering said the repayment premium was originally introduced to head off the possibility of councils settling loans and reborrowing if they knew rates would fall.

“That created a risk that the Debt Management Office was losing money,” he said. “In order to protect themselves, they lowered the discount margin.

“Don’t get me wrong, I would love it if there was a mechanism where authorities could refinance some of these higher rate loans without penalty but the money central government lost would have to be borne by the general taxpayer.”

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government 24th Jun, 2022
  • The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark 12th Jan, 2021
  • Economy: Inflation on the rise while the MPC sticks with ‘patient approach’ 28th Jul, 2021
  • David Green: Sidestepping the pitfalls of accounting for council-owned companies 14th May, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 days ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 4 days ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 5 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 5 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 1 week ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Portsmouth looks beyond borders with Manchester property investment
  • Next story Local government finances are “not unsustainable”

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares